Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 504 cities measured

India vs Myanmar Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Myanmar has cleaner air than India right now: its cities average AQI 36 against 143.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are India 149 (242 cities) and Myanmar 106 (3 cities). Myanmar has lost more forest since 2001. Myanmar has more tree cover in its cities.

India

Average of 471 cities

AQI 143

Unhealthy for sensitive groups

At ground stations
AQI 149
Tree cover
27.3%
Forest lost since 2001
2.6 million ha
Myanmar

Average of 33 cities

AQI 36

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 106
Tree cover
44.4%
Forest lost since 2001
5.35 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

India vs Myanmar at a glance

Myanmar is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and India on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

India and Myanmar compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
IndiaMyanmar
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.14336 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.149106 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.71%9% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.2.6 million ha (better)5.35 million ha
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.6.7% (better)13%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.27.3%44.4% (better)

Air quality today

Is Myanmar cleaner than India?

On air quality, yes, right now. Myanmar has cleaner air than India right now: its cities average AQI 36 against 143.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are India 149 (242 cities) and Myanmar 106 (3 cities).

71% of the measured cities in India are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 9% in Myanmar.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

India

  • Good6 (1%)
  • Moderate130 (28%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups150 (32%)
  • Unhealthy146 (31%)
  • Very unhealthy21 (4%)
  • Hazardous18 (4%)

Myanmar

  • Good25 (76%)
  • Moderate5 (15%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups3 (9%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do India and Myanmar compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of India average cleaner air than 1% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Myanmar than 79%.

Cleaner air than…

India
Beats 1%
Myanmar
Beats 79%

More tree cover than…

India
Beats 59%
Myanmar
Beats 95%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, India or Myanmar?

Myanmar has lost more: about 5.35 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.6 million ha in India, or 2.1 times as much. 2 million ha of Myanmar's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

India
20012025

Worst year: 2017, with 190,000 ha lost.

Myanmar
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 363,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in India and Myanmar, 2001 to 2025
IndiaMyanmar
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.2.6 million ha (better)5.35 million ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.6.7% (better)13%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.730,000 ha (better)2 million ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeShifting farming (59%)Shifting farming (61%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, India or Myanmar?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 27.3%, a gap of 17.1 percentage points.

India27.3%
Myanmar44.4%
Tree figures for India and Myanmar
IndiaMyanmar
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.39.1M (better)4.2M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.77%15% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.17.9M133K (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind India and Myanmar

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

India

Greenest measured city
Dārjiling88.2% tree cover
Worst air right now
TonkAQI 586

Myanmar

Greenest measured city
Thandwe66.3% tree cover
Worst air right now
MingaladonAQI 106

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 471 in India and 33 in Myanmar, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. India rests on 471 cities against 33, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

India vs Myanmar: your questions answered

Is Myanmar cleaner than India?

On air quality, yes, right now: Myanmar's cities average AQI 36 against 143 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are India 149 (242 cities) and Myanmar 106 (3 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, India or Myanmar?

Myanmar has lost more: about 5.35 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.6 million ha in India, or 2.1 times as much. 2 million ha of Myanmar's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, India or Myanmar?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 27.3%, a gap of 17.1 percentage points.

How many cities are the India and Myanmar figures based on?

471 measured cities in India and 33 in Myanmar. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of India and Myanmar?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for India

More comparisons for Myanmar

Build your own

Compare India with somewhere else

This place

India