Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 63 cities measured

Ethiopia vs Myanmar Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Myanmar has cleaner air than Ethiopia right now: its cities average AQI 19 against 60.

Myanmar has lost more forest since 2001. Myanmar has more tree cover in its cities.

Ethiopia

Average of 30 cities

AQI 60

Moderate

Tree cover
22.2%
Forest lost since 2001
559,000 ha
Myanmar

Average of 33 cities

AQI 19

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 14
Tree cover
44.4%
Forest lost since 2001
5.35 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Ethiopia vs Myanmar at a glance

Myanmar is ahead on 3 of 5 measures, and Ethiopia on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Ethiopia and Myanmar compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
EthiopiaMyanmar
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.6019 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.7%0% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.559,000 ha (better)5.35 million ha
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.4.6% (better)13%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.22.2%44.4% (better)

Air quality today

Is Myanmar cleaner than Ethiopia?

On air quality, yes, right now. Myanmar has cleaner air than Ethiopia right now: its cities average AQI 19 against 60.

7% of the measured cities in Ethiopia are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Myanmar.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Ethiopia

  • Good8 (27%)
  • Moderate20 (67%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups2 (7%)

Myanmar

  • Good30 (91%)
  • Moderate3 (9%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Ethiopia and Myanmar compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Ethiopia average cleaner air than 38% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Myanmar than 99%.

Cleaner air than…

Ethiopia
Beats 38%
Myanmar
Beats 99%

More tree cover than…

Ethiopia
Beats 45%
Myanmar
Beats 95%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Ethiopia or Myanmar?

Myanmar has lost more: about 5.35 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 559,000 ha in Ethiopia, or 9.6 times as much. 2 million ha of Myanmar's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Ethiopia
20012025

Worst year: 2012, with 41,800 ha lost.

Myanmar
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 363,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Ethiopia and Myanmar, 2001 to 2025
EthiopiaMyanmar
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.559,000 ha (better)5.35 million ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.4.6% (better)13%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.484,000 ha (better)2 million ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (85%)Shifting farming (61%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Ethiopia or Myanmar?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 22.2%, a gap of 22.2 percentage points.

Ethiopia22.2%
Myanmar44.4%
Tree figures for Ethiopia and Myanmar
EthiopiaMyanmar
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.2.0M4.2M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.73%15% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.985K133K (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Ethiopia and Myanmar

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Ethiopia

Greenest measured city
Dīla62.3% tree cover
Worst air right now
Hosa’inaAQI 142

Myanmar

Greenest measured city
Thandwe66.3% tree cover
Worst air right now
MingaladonAQI 14

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 30 in Ethiopia and 33 in Myanmar, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Myanmar rests on 33 cities against 30, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Ethiopia vs Myanmar: your questions answered

Is Myanmar cleaner than Ethiopia?

On air quality, yes, right now: Myanmar's cities average AQI 19 against 60 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather.

Which country has lost more forest, Ethiopia or Myanmar?

Myanmar has lost more: about 5.35 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 559,000 ha in Ethiopia, or 9.6 times as much. 2 million ha of Myanmar's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Ethiopia or Myanmar?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 22.2%, a gap of 22.2 percentage points.

How many cities are the Ethiopia and Myanmar figures based on?

30 measured cities in Ethiopia and 33 in Myanmar. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Does this cover the whole of Ethiopia and Myanmar?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Ethiopia

More comparisons for Myanmar

Build your own

Compare Ethiopia with somewhere else

This place

Ethiopia