Country comparison · 669 cities measured
China vs Ethiopia Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Ethiopia has cleaner air than China right now: its cities average AQI 60 against 114.
China has lost more forest since 2001. China has more tree cover in its cities.
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
China114Ethiopia60
Head to head
China vs Ethiopia at a glance
Ethiopia is ahead on 4 of 5 measures, and China on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.
| China | Ethiopia | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 114 | 60 (better) |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 55% | 7% (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 13.5 million ha | 559,000 ha (better) |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 8.3% | 4.6% (better) |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 22.9% (better) | 22.2% |
Air quality today
Is Ethiopia cleaner than China?
On air quality, yes, right now. Ethiopia has cleaner air than China right now: its cities average AQI 60 against 114.
55% of the measured cities in China are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 7% in Ethiopia.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
China
- Good47 (7%)
- Moderate241 (38%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups141 (22%)
- Unhealthy190 (30%)
- Very unhealthy20 (3%)
Ethiopia
- Good8 (27%)
- Moderate20 (67%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups2 (7%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do China and Ethiopia compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of China average cleaner air than 4% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Ethiopia than 38%.
Cleaner air than…
- China
- Beats 4%
- Ethiopia
- Beats 38%
More tree cover than…
- China
- Beats 46%
- Ethiopia
- Beats 45%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, China or Ethiopia?
China has lost more: about 13.5 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 559,000 ha in Ethiopia, or 24 times as much. 2.24 million ha of China's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2008, with 739,000 ha lost.
Worst year: 2012, with 41,800 ha lost.
| China | Ethiopia | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 13.5 million ha | 559,000 ha (better) |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 8.3% | 4.6% (better) |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 2.24 million ha | 484,000 ha (better) |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Holding steady | Holding steady |
| Main known cause | Logging (75%) | Farms, pasture and plantations (85%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, China or Ethiopia?
China does: its measured cities average 22.9% tree cover against 22.2%, a gap of 0.8 percentage points.
| China | Ethiopia | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 43.8M (better) | 2.0M |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 81% | 73% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 27.4M | 985K (better) |
Behind the averages
The cities behind China and Ethiopia
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 639 in China and 30 in Ethiopia, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. China rests on 639 cities against 30, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
China vs Ethiopia: your questions answered
Is Ethiopia cleaner than China?
On air quality, yes, right now: Ethiopia's cities average AQI 60 against 114 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather.
Which country has lost more forest, China or Ethiopia?
China has lost more: about 13.5 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 559,000 ha in Ethiopia, or 24 times as much. 2.24 million ha of China's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, China or Ethiopia?
China does: its measured cities average 22.9% tree cover against 22.2%, a gap of 0.8 percentage points.
How many cities are the China and Ethiopia figures based on?
639 measured cities in China and 30 in Ethiopia. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Does this cover the whole of China and Ethiopia?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for China
More comparisons for Ethiopia
Build your own
Compare China with somewhere else
This place
China