Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 753 cities measured

China vs Mexico Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Mexico has cleaner air than China right now: its cities average AQI 69 against 114.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 125 (433 cities) and Mexico 91 (46 cities). China has lost more forest since 2001. China has more tree cover in its cities.

China

Average of 639 cities

AQI 114

Unhealthy for sensitive groups

At ground stations
AQI 125
Tree cover
22.9%
Forest lost since 2001
13.5 million ha
Mexico

Average of 114 cities

AQI 69

Moderate

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 91
Tree cover
14.6%
Forest lost since 2001
5.46 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

China vs Mexico at a glance

Mexico is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and China on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

China and Mexico compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
ChinaMexico
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.11469 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.12591 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.55%22% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.13.5 million ha5.46 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.8.3% (better)10%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.22.9% (better)14.6%

Air quality today

Is Mexico cleaner than China?

On air quality, yes, right now. Mexico has cleaner air than China right now: its cities average AQI 69 against 114.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 125 (433 cities) and Mexico 91 (46 cities).

55% of the measured cities in China are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 22% in Mexico.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

China

  • Good47 (7%)
  • Moderate241 (38%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups141 (22%)
  • Unhealthy190 (30%)
  • Very unhealthy20 (3%)

Mexico

  • Good38 (33%)
  • Moderate51 (45%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups24 (21%)
  • Unhealthy1 (1%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do China and Mexico compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of China average cleaner air than 4% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Mexico than 25%.

Cleaner air than…

China
Beats 4%
Mexico
Beats 25%

More tree cover than…

China
Beats 46%
Mexico
Beats 29%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, China or Mexico?

China has lost more: about 13.5 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 5.46 million ha in Mexico, or 2.5 times as much. 2.24 million ha of China's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

China
20012025

Worst year: 2008, with 739,000 ha lost.

Mexico
20012025

Worst year: 2024, with 332,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in China and Mexico, 2001 to 2025
ChinaMexico
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.13.5 million ha5.46 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.8.3% (better)10%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.2.24 million ha (better)4.39 million ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeLogging (75%)Farms, pasture and plantations (79%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, China or Mexico?

China does: its measured cities average 22.9% tree cover against 14.6%, a gap of 8.3 percentage points.

China22.9%
Mexico14.6%
Tree figures for China and Mexico
ChinaMexico
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.43.8M (better)5.1M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.81% (better)94%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.27.4M6.1M (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind China and Mexico

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

China

Greenest measured city
Fenghuang80.9% tree cover
Worst air right now
FuxinAQI 243

Mexico

Greenest measured city
Teziutlan52.6% tree cover
Worst air right now
TuxtlaAQI 146

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 639 in China and 114 in Mexico, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. China rests on 639 cities against 114, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

China vs Mexico: your questions answered

Is Mexico cleaner than China?

On air quality, yes, right now: Mexico's cities average AQI 69 against 114 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 125 (433 cities) and Mexico 91 (46 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, China or Mexico?

China has lost more: about 13.5 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 5.46 million ha in Mexico, or 2.5 times as much. 2.24 million ha of China's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, China or Mexico?

China does: its measured cities average 22.9% tree cover against 14.6%, a gap of 8.3 percentage points.

How many cities are the China and Mexico figures based on?

639 measured cities in China and 114 in Mexico. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of China and Mexico?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for China

More comparisons for Mexico

Build your own

Compare China with somewhere else

This place

China