Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 163 cities measured

Iraq vs Mexico Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Mexico has cleaner air than Iraq right now: its cities average AQI 69 against 72.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Iraq 106 (3 cities) and Mexico 91 (46 cities). Mexico has lost more forest since 2001. Mexico has more tree cover in its cities.

Iraq

Average of 49 cities

AQI 72

Moderate

At ground stations
AQI 106
Tree cover
5.1%
Forest lost since 2001
138 ha
Mexico

Average of 114 cities

AQI 69

Moderate

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 91
Tree cover
14.6%
Forest lost since 2001
5.46 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Iraq vs Mexico at a glance

Iraq and Mexico are level, each ahead on 3 of 6 measures. The better figure in each row is marked.

Iraq and Mexico compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
IraqMexico
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.7269 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.10691 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.16% (better)22%
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.138 ha (better)5.46 million ha
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.under 1% (better)10%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.5.1%14.6% (better)

Air quality today

Is Mexico cleaner than Iraq?

On air quality, yes, right now. Mexico has cleaner air than Iraq right now: its cities average AQI 69 against 72.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Iraq 106 (3 cities) and Mexico 91 (46 cities).

16% of the measured cities in Iraq are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 22% in Mexico.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Iraq

  • Good10 (20%)
  • Moderate31 (63%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups4 (8%)
  • Unhealthy4 (8%)

Mexico

  • Good38 (33%)
  • Moderate51 (45%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups24 (21%)
  • Unhealthy1 (1%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Iraq and Mexico compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Iraq average cleaner air than 22% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Mexico than 25%.

Cleaner air than…

Iraq
Beats 22%
Mexico
Beats 25%

More tree cover than…

Iraq
Beats 10%
Mexico
Beats 29%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Iraq or Mexico?

Mexico has lost more: about 5.46 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 138 ha in Iraq, or 39669 times as much. 4.39 million ha of Mexico's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Iraq
20012025

Worst year: 2003, with 19 ha lost.

Mexico
20012025

Worst year: 2024, with 332,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Iraq and Mexico, 2001 to 2025
IraqMexico
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.138 ha (better)5.46 million ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.under 1% (better)10%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.60 ha (better)4.39 million ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callHolding steady
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (33%)Farms, pasture and plantations (79%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Iraq or Mexico?

Mexico does: its measured cities average 14.6% tree cover against 5.1%, a gap of 9.5 percentage points.

Iraq5.1%
Mexico14.6%
Tree figures for Iraq and Mexico
IraqMexico
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.770K5.1M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.100%94% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.4.0M (better)6.1M

Behind the averages

The cities behind Iraq and Mexico

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Iraq

Greenest measured city
Al Miqdādīyah19.8% tree cover
Worst air right now
SulaymaniyahAQI 131

Mexico

Greenest measured city
Teziutlan52.6% tree cover
Worst air right now
TuxtlaAQI 146

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 49 in Iraq and 114 in Mexico, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Mexico rests on 114 cities against 49, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Iraq vs Mexico: your questions answered

Is Mexico cleaner than Iraq?

On air quality, yes, right now: Mexico's cities average AQI 69 against 72 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Iraq 106 (3 cities) and Mexico 91 (46 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Iraq or Mexico?

Mexico has lost more: about 5.46 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 138 ha in Iraq, or 39669 times as much. 4.39 million ha of Mexico's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Iraq or Mexico?

Mexico does: its measured cities average 14.6% tree cover against 5.1%, a gap of 9.5 percentage points.

How many cities are the Iraq and Mexico figures based on?

49 measured cities in Iraq and 114 in Mexico. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Iraq and Mexico?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Iraq

More comparisons for Mexico

Build your own

Compare Iraq with somewhere else

This place

Iraq