Country comparison · 105 cities measured
Iraq vs South Korea Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Iraq has cleaner air than South Korea right now: its cities average AQI 72 against 80.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Iraq 106 (3 cities) and South Korea 80 (56 cities), which puts South Korea ahead instead. South Korea has lost more forest since 2001. South Korea has more tree cover in its cities.
Average of 49 cities
AQI 72
Moderate
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 106
- Tree cover
- 5.1%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 138 ha
Average of 56 cities
AQI 80
Moderate
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 80
- Tree cover
- 28.4%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 436,000 ha
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Iraq72South Korea80
Head to head
Iraq vs South Korea at a glance
Iraq and South Korea are level, each ahead on 3 of 6 measures. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Iraq | South Korea | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 72 (better) | 80 |
| At ground stationsCities with a current station reading. | 106 | 80 (better) |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 16% | 9% (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 138 ha (better) | 436,000 ha |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | under 1% (better) | 8.2% |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 5.1% | 28.4% (better) |
Air quality today
Is Iraq cleaner than South Korea?
On air quality, yes, right now. Iraq has cleaner air than South Korea right now: its cities average AQI 72 against 80.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Iraq 106 (3 cities) and South Korea 80 (56 cities), which puts South Korea ahead instead.
16% of the measured cities in Iraq are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 9% in South Korea.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Iraq
- Good10 (20%)
- Moderate31 (63%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups4 (8%)
- Unhealthy4 (8%)
South Korea
- Good1 (2%)
- Moderate50 (89%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups5 (9%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Iraq and South Korea compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of Iraq average cleaner air than 22% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of South Korea than 14%.
Cleaner air than…
- Iraq
- Beats 22%
- South Korea
- Beats 14%
More tree cover than…
- Iraq
- Beats 10%
- South Korea
- Beats 64%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Iraq or South Korea?
South Korea has lost more: about 436,000 ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 138 ha in Iraq, or 3170 times as much. 67,300 ha of South Korea's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2003, with 19 ha lost.
Worst year: 2025, with 87,000 ha lost.
| Iraq | South Korea | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 138 ha (better) | 436,000 ha |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | under 1% (better) | 8.2% |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 60 ha (better) | 67,300 ha |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Too little to call | Speeding up |
| Main known cause | Farms, pasture and plantations (33%) | Logging (70%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Iraq or South Korea?
South Korea does: its measured cities average 28.4% tree cover against 5.1%, a gap of 23.3 percentage points.
| Iraq | South Korea | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 770K | 4.8M (better) |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 100% | 57% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 4.0M | 1.3M (better) |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Iraq and South Korea
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Iraq
- Greenest measured city
- Al Miqdādīyah19.8% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- SulaymaniyahAQI 131
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 49 in Iraq and 56 in South Korea, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. South Korea rests on 56 cities against 49, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Iraq vs South Korea: your questions answered
Is Iraq cleaner than South Korea?
On air quality, yes, right now: Iraq's cities average AQI 72 against 80 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Iraq 106 (3 cities) and South Korea 80 (56 cities), which puts South Korea ahead instead.
Which country has lost more forest, Iraq or South Korea?
South Korea has lost more: about 436,000 ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 138 ha in Iraq, or 3170 times as much. 67,300 ha of South Korea's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Iraq or South Korea?
South Korea does: its measured cities average 28.4% tree cover against 5.1%, a gap of 23.3 percentage points.
How many cities are the Iraq and South Korea figures based on?
49 measured cities in Iraq and 56 in South Korea. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Why are there two air quality averages for each country?
The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.
Does this cover the whole of Iraq and South Korea?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Iraq
More comparisons for South Korea
Build your own
Compare Iraq with somewhere else
This place
Iraq