Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 94 cities measured

Bangladesh vs Iraq Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Iraq has cleaner air than Bangladesh right now: its cities average AQI 72 against 132.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Bangladesh 215 (9 cities) and Iraq 106 (3 cities). Bangladesh has lost more forest since 2001. Bangladesh has more tree cover in its cities.

Bangladesh

Average of 45 cities

AQI 132

Unhealthy for sensitive groups

At ground stations
AQI 215
Tree cover
52.9%
Forest lost since 2001
263,000 ha
Iraq

Average of 49 cities

AQI 72

Moderate

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 106
Tree cover
5.1%
Forest lost since 2001
138 ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Bangladesh vs Iraq at a glance

Iraq is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Bangladesh on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Bangladesh and Iraq compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
BangladeshIraq
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.13272 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.215106 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.53%16% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.263,000 ha138 ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.14%under 1% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.52.9% (better)5.1%

Air quality today

Is Iraq cleaner than Bangladesh?

On air quality, yes, right now. Iraq has cleaner air than Bangladesh right now: its cities average AQI 72 against 132.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Bangladesh 215 (9 cities) and Iraq 106 (3 cities).

53% of the measured cities in Bangladesh are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 16% in Iraq.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Bangladesh

  • Good2 (4%)
  • Moderate19 (42%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups8 (18%)
  • Unhealthy9 (20%)
  • Very unhealthy7 (16%)

Iraq

  • Good10 (20%)
  • Moderate31 (63%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups4 (8%)
  • Unhealthy4 (8%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Bangladesh and Iraq compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Bangladesh average cleaner air than 2% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Iraq than 22%.

Cleaner air than…

Bangladesh
Beats 2%
Iraq
Beats 22%

More tree cover than…

Bangladesh
Beats 98%
Iraq
Beats 10%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Bangladesh or Iraq?

Bangladesh has lost more: about 263,000 ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 138 ha in Iraq, or 1909 times as much. 49,400 ha of Bangladesh's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Bangladesh
20012025

Worst year: 2017, with 27,500 ha lost.

Iraq
20012025

Worst year: 2003, with 19 ha lost.

Forest loss in Bangladesh and Iraq, 2001 to 2025
BangladeshIraq
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.263,000 ha138 ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.14%under 1% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.49,400 ha60 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Slowing downToo little to call
Main known causeShifting farming (73%)Farms, pasture and plantations (33%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Bangladesh or Iraq?

Bangladesh does: its measured cities average 52.9% tree cover against 5.1%, a gap of 47.8 percentage points.

Bangladesh52.9%
Iraq5.1%
Tree figures for Bangladesh and Iraq
BangladeshIraq
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.7.0M (better)770K
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.18% (better)100%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.330K (better)4.0M

Behind the averages

The cities behind Bangladesh and Iraq

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Bangladesh

Greenest measured city
Bagerhat76.9% tree cover
Worst air right now
SavarAQI 244

Iraq

Greenest measured city
Al Miqdādīyah19.8% tree cover
Worst air right now
SulaymaniyahAQI 131

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 45 in Bangladesh and 49 in Iraq, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Iraq rests on 49 cities against 45, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Bangladesh vs Iraq: your questions answered

Is Iraq cleaner than Bangladesh?

On air quality, yes, right now: Iraq's cities average AQI 72 against 132 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Bangladesh 215 (9 cities) and Iraq 106 (3 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Bangladesh or Iraq?

Bangladesh has lost more: about 263,000 ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 138 ha in Iraq, or 1909 times as much. 49,400 ha of Bangladesh's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Bangladesh or Iraq?

Bangladesh does: its measured cities average 52.9% tree cover against 5.1%, a gap of 47.8 percentage points.

How many cities are the Bangladesh and Iraq figures based on?

45 measured cities in Bangladesh and 49 in Iraq. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Bangladesh and Iraq?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Bangladesh

More comparisons for Iraq

Build your own

Compare Bangladesh with somewhere else

This place

Bangladesh