Country comparison · 76 cities measured
Bangladesh vs Chile Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Chile has cleaner air than Bangladesh right now: its cities average AQI 60 against 132.
Chile has lost more forest since 2001. Bangladesh has more tree cover in its cities.
Average of 45 cities
AQI 132
Unhealthy for sensitive groups
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 215
- Tree cover
- 52.9%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 263,000 ha
Average of 31 cities
AQI 60
Moderate
Cleaner on average
- Tree cover
- 12.9%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 2.43 million ha
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Bangladesh132Chile60
Head to head
Bangladesh vs Chile at a glance
Chile is ahead on 3 of 5 measures, and Bangladesh on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Bangladesh | Chile | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 132 | 60 (better) |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 53% | 6% (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 263,000 ha (better) | 2.43 million ha |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 14% | 14% (better) |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 52.9% (better) | 12.9% |
Air quality today
Is Chile cleaner than Bangladesh?
On air quality, yes, right now. Chile has cleaner air than Bangladesh right now: its cities average AQI 60 against 132.
53% of the measured cities in Bangladesh are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 6% in Chile.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Bangladesh
- Good2 (4%)
- Moderate19 (42%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups8 (18%)
- Unhealthy9 (20%)
- Very unhealthy7 (16%)
Chile
- Good12 (39%)
- Moderate17 (55%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups2 (6%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Bangladesh and Chile compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of Bangladesh average cleaner air than 2% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Chile than 38%.
Cleaner air than…
- Bangladesh
- Beats 2%
- Chile
- Beats 38%
More tree cover than…
- Bangladesh
- Beats 98%
- Chile
- Beats 25%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Bangladesh or Chile?
Chile has lost more: about 2.43 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 263,000 ha in Bangladesh, or 9.2 times as much. 96,100 ha of Chile's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2017, with 27,500 ha lost.
Worst year: 2017, with 214,000 ha lost.
| Bangladesh | Chile | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 263,000 ha (better) | 2.43 million ha |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 14% | 14% (better) |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 49,400 ha (better) | 96,100 ha |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Slowing down | Slowing down |
| Main known cause | Shifting farming (73%) | Logging (82%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Bangladesh or Chile?
Bangladesh does: its measured cities average 52.9% tree cover against 12.9%, a gap of 40.0 percentage points.
| Bangladesh | Chile | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 7.0M (better) | 1.2M |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 18% (better) | 94% |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 330K (better) | 1.6M |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Bangladesh and Chile
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 45 in Bangladesh and 31 in Chile, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Bangladesh rests on 45 cities against 31, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Bangladesh vs Chile: your questions answered
Is Chile cleaner than Bangladesh?
On air quality, yes, right now: Chile's cities average AQI 60 against 132 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather.
Which country has lost more forest, Bangladesh or Chile?
Chile has lost more: about 2.43 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 263,000 ha in Bangladesh, or 9.2 times as much. 96,100 ha of Chile's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Bangladesh or Chile?
Bangladesh does: its measured cities average 52.9% tree cover against 12.9%, a gap of 40.0 percentage points.
How many cities are the Bangladesh and Chile figures based on?
45 measured cities in Bangladesh and 31 in Chile. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Does this cover the whole of Bangladesh and Chile?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Bangladesh
More comparisons for Chile
Build your own
Compare Bangladesh with somewhere else
This place
Bangladesh