Country comparison · 62 cities measured
Chile vs Thailand Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Chile has cleaner air than Thailand right now: its cities average AQI 60 against 62.
Thailand has lost more forest since 2001. Thailand has more tree cover in its cities.
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Chile60Thailand62
Head to head
Chile vs Thailand at a glance
Chile is ahead on 3 of 5 measures, and Thailand on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Chile | Thailand | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 60 (better) | 62 |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 6% | 0% (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 2.43 million ha (better) | 2.84 million ha |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 14% (better) | 14% |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 12.9% | 32.7% (better) |
Air quality today
Is Chile cleaner than Thailand?
On air quality, yes, right now. Chile has cleaner air than Thailand right now: its cities average AQI 60 against 62.
6% of the measured cities in Chile are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Thailand.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Chile
- Good12 (39%)
- Moderate17 (55%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups2 (6%)
Thailand
- Good5 (16%)
- Moderate26 (84%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Chile and Thailand compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of Chile average cleaner air than 38% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Thailand than 34%.
Cleaner air than…
- Chile
- Beats 38%
- Thailand
- Beats 34%
More tree cover than…
- Chile
- Beats 25%
- Thailand
- Beats 73%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Chile or Thailand?
Thailand has lost more: about 2.84 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.43 million ha in Chile. 2.49 million ha of Thailand's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2017, with 214,000 ha lost.
Worst year: 2017, with 199,000 ha lost.
| Chile | Thailand | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 2.43 million ha (better) | 2.84 million ha |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 14% (better) | 14% |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 96,100 ha (better) | 2.49 million ha |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Slowing down | Holding steady |
| Main known cause | Logging (82%) | Farms, pasture and plantations (86%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Chile or Thailand?
Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 12.9%, a gap of 19.9 percentage points.
| Chile | Thailand | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 1.2M | 3.0M (better) |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 94% | 42% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 1.6M | 286K (better) |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Chile and Thailand
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Thailand
- Greenest measured city
- Kabin Buri64.4% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- Chon BuriAQI 85
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 31 in Chile and 31 in Thailand, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. These two rest on the same number of cities, so they are unusually like for like. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Chile vs Thailand: your questions answered
Is Chile cleaner than Thailand?
On air quality, yes, right now: Chile's cities average AQI 60 against 62 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather.
Which country has lost more forest, Chile or Thailand?
Thailand has lost more: about 2.84 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.43 million ha in Chile. 2.49 million ha of Thailand's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Chile or Thailand?
Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 12.9%, a gap of 19.9 percentage points.
How many cities are the Chile and Thailand figures based on?
31 measured cities in Chile and 31 in Thailand. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Does this cover the whole of Chile and Thailand?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Chile
More comparisons for Thailand
Build your own
Compare Chile with somewhere else
This place
Chile