Country comparison · 123 cities measured
Thailand vs United Kingdom Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
United Kingdom has cleaner air than Thailand right now: its cities average AQI 35 against 62.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Thailand 67 (28 cities) and United Kingdom 32 (81 cities). Thailand has lost more forest since 2001. Thailand has more tree cover in its cities.
Average of 31 cities
AQI 62
Moderate
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 67
- Tree cover
- 32.7%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 2.84 million ha
Average of 92 cities
AQI 35
Good
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 32
- Tree cover
- 26.6%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 607,000 ha
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Thailand62United Kingdom35
Head to head
Thailand vs United Kingdom at a glance
United Kingdom is ahead on 3 of 6 measures, and Thailand on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Thailand | United Kingdom | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 62 | 35 (better) |
| At ground stationsCities with a current station reading. | 67 | 32 (better) |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 0% | 0% |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 2.84 million ha | 607,000 ha (better) |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 14% (better) | 17% |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 32.7% (better) | 26.6% |
Air quality today
Is United Kingdom cleaner than Thailand?
On air quality, yes, right now. United Kingdom has cleaner air than Thailand right now: its cities average AQI 35 against 62.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Thailand 67 (28 cities) and United Kingdom 32 (81 cities).
0% of the measured cities in Thailand are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in the United Kingdom.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Thailand
- Good5 (16%)
- Moderate26 (84%)
United Kingdom
- Good66 (72%)
- Moderate26 (28%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Thailand and United Kingdom compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of Thailand average cleaner air than 34% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of the United Kingdom than 80%.
Cleaner air than…
- Thailand
- Beats 34%
- United Kingdom
- Beats 80%
More tree cover than…
- Thailand
- Beats 73%
- United Kingdom
- Beats 58%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Thailand or United Kingdom?
Thailand has lost more: about 2.84 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 607,000 ha in the United Kingdom, or 4.7 times as much. 2.49 million ha of Thailand's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2017, with 199,000 ha lost.
Worst year: 2009, with 37,400 ha lost.
| Thailand | United Kingdom | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 2.84 million ha | 607,000 ha (better) |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 14% (better) | 17% |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 2.49 million ha | 15,700 ha (better) |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Holding steady | Holding steady |
| Main known cause | Farms, pasture and plantations (86%) | Logging (93%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Thailand or United Kingdom?
Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 26.6%, a gap of 6.2 percentage points.
| Thailand | United Kingdom | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 3.0M | 7.4M (better) |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 42% (better) | 68% |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 286K (better) | 1.5M |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Thailand and United Kingdom
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Thailand
- Greenest measured city
- Kabin Buri64.4% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- Chon BuriAQI 85
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 31 in Thailand and 92 in the United Kingdom, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. United Kingdom rests on 92 cities against 31, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Thailand vs United Kingdom: your questions answered
Is United Kingdom cleaner than Thailand?
On air quality, yes, right now: United Kingdom's cities average AQI 35 against 62 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Thailand 67 (28 cities) and United Kingdom 32 (81 cities).
Which country has lost more forest, Thailand or United Kingdom?
Thailand has lost more: about 2.84 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 607,000 ha in the United Kingdom, or 4.7 times as much. 2.49 million ha of Thailand's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Thailand or United Kingdom?
Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 26.6%, a gap of 6.2 percentage points.
How many cities are the Thailand and United Kingdom figures based on?
31 measured cities in Thailand and 92 in the United Kingdom. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Why are there two air quality averages for each country?
The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.
Does this cover the whole of Thailand and the United Kingdom?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Thailand
More comparisons for United Kingdom
Build your own
Compare Thailand with somewhere else
This place
Thailand