Country comparison · 128 cities measured
Iran vs Thailand Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Iran has cleaner air than Thailand right now: its cities average AQI 61 against 62.
Thailand has lost more forest since 2001. Thailand has more tree cover in its cities.
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Iran61Thailand62
Head to head
Iran vs Thailand at a glance
Iran is ahead on 3 of 5 measures, and Thailand on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Iran | Thailand | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 61 (better) | 62 |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 11% | 0% (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 4,270 ha (better) | 2.84 million ha |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | under 1% (better) | 14% |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 5.0% | 32.7% (better) |
Air quality today
Is Iran cleaner than Thailand?
On air quality, yes, right now. Iran has cleaner air than Thailand right now: its cities average AQI 61 against 62.
11% of the measured cities in Iran are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Thailand.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Iran
- Good38 (39%)
- Moderate48 (49%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups3 (3%)
- Unhealthy8 (8%)
Thailand
- Good5 (16%)
- Moderate26 (84%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Iran and Thailand compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of Iran average cleaner air than 37% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Thailand than 34%.
Cleaner air than…
- Iran
- Beats 37%
- Thailand
- Beats 34%
More tree cover than…
- Iran
- Beats 9%
- Thailand
- Beats 73%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Iran or Thailand?
Thailand has lost more: about 2.84 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 4,270 ha in Iran, or 665 times as much. 2.49 million ha of Thailand's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2002, with 559 ha lost.
Worst year: 2017, with 199,000 ha lost.
| Iran | Thailand | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 4,270 ha (better) | 2.84 million ha |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | under 1% (better) | 14% |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 1,370 ha (better) | 2.49 million ha |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Holding steady | Holding steady |
| Main known cause | Logging (27%) | Farms, pasture and plantations (86%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Iran or Thailand?
Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 5.0%, a gap of 27.7 percentage points.
| Iran | Thailand | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 1.5M | 3.0M (better) |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 99% | 42% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 7.8M | 286K (better) |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Iran and Thailand
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Thailand
- Greenest measured city
- Kabin Buri64.4% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- Chon BuriAQI 85
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 97 in Iran and 31 in Thailand, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Iran rests on 97 cities against 31, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Iran vs Thailand: your questions answered
Is Iran cleaner than Thailand?
On air quality, yes, right now: Iran's cities average AQI 61 against 62 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather.
Which country has lost more forest, Iran or Thailand?
Thailand has lost more: about 2.84 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 4,270 ha in Iran, or 665 times as much. 2.49 million ha of Thailand's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Iran or Thailand?
Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 5.0%, a gap of 27.7 percentage points.
How many cities are the Iran and Thailand figures based on?
97 measured cities in Iran and 31 in Thailand. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Does this cover the whole of Iran and Thailand?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Iran
More comparisons for Thailand
Build your own
Compare Iran with somewhere else
This place
Iran