Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 670 cities measured

China vs Thailand Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Thailand has cleaner air than China right now: its cities average AQI 61 against 108.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 110 (433 cities) and Thailand 61 (31 cities). China has lost more forest since 2001. Thailand has more tree cover in its cities.

China

Average of 639 cities

AQI 108

Unhealthy for sensitive groups

At ground stations
AQI 110
Tree cover
22.9%
Forest lost since 2001
13.5 million ha
Thailand

Average of 31 cities

AQI 61

Moderate

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 61
Tree cover
32.7%
Forest lost since 2001
2.84 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

China vs Thailand at a glance

Thailand is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and China on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

China and Thailand compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
ChinaThailand
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.10861 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.11061 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.49%0% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.13.5 million ha2.84 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.8.3% (better)14%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.22.9%32.7% (better)

Air quality today

Is Thailand cleaner than China?

On air quality, yes, right now. Thailand has cleaner air than China right now: its cities average AQI 61 against 108.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 110 (433 cities) and Thailand 61 (31 cities).

49% of the measured cities in China are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Thailand.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

China

  • Good39 (6%)
  • Moderate285 (45%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups170 (27%)
  • Unhealthy130 (20%)
  • Very unhealthy15 (2%)

Thailand

  • Good5 (16%)
  • Moderate26 (84%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do China and Thailand compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of China average cleaner air than 4% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Thailand than 32%.

Cleaner air than…

China
Beats 4%
Thailand
Beats 32%

More tree cover than…

China
Beats 46%
Thailand
Beats 73%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, China or Thailand?

China has lost more: about 13.5 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.84 million ha in Thailand, or 4.7 times as much. 2.24 million ha of China's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

China
20012025

Worst year: 2008, with 739,000 ha lost.

Thailand
20012025

Worst year: 2017, with 199,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in China and Thailand, 2001 to 2025
ChinaThailand
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.13.5 million ha2.84 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.8.3% (better)14%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.2.24 million ha (better)2.49 million ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeLogging (75%)Farms, pasture and plantations (86%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, China or Thailand?

Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 22.9%, a gap of 9.8 percentage points.

China22.9%
Thailand32.7%
Tree figures for China and Thailand
ChinaThailand
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.43.8M (better)3.0M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.80%42% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.25.9M286K (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind China and Thailand

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

China

Greenest measured city
Fenghuang80.9% tree cover
Worst air right now
JinzhouAQI 235

Thailand

Greenest measured city
Kabin Buri64.4% tree cover
Worst air right now
Khlong LuangAQI 75

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 639 in China and 31 in Thailand, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. China rests on 639 cities against 31, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

China vs Thailand: your questions answered

Is Thailand cleaner than China?

On air quality, yes, right now: Thailand's cities average AQI 61 against 108 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 110 (433 cities) and Thailand 61 (31 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, China or Thailand?

China has lost more: about 13.5 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.84 million ha in Thailand, or 4.7 times as much. 2.24 million ha of China's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, China or Thailand?

Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 22.9%, a gap of 9.8 percentage points.

How many cities are the China and Thailand figures based on?

639 measured cities in China and 31 in Thailand. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of China and Thailand?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for China

More comparisons for Thailand

Build your own

Compare China with somewhere else

This place

China