Country comparison · 87 cities measured
South Korea vs Thailand Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Thailand has cleaner air than South Korea right now: its cities average AQI 62 against 80.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are South Korea 80 (56 cities) and Thailand 67 (28 cities). Thailand has lost more forest since 2001. Thailand has more tree cover in its cities.
Average of 56 cities
AQI 80
Moderate
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 80
- Tree cover
- 28.4%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 436,000 ha
Average of 31 cities
AQI 62
Moderate
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 67
- Tree cover
- 32.7%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 2.84 million ha
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
South Korea80Thailand62
Head to head
South Korea vs Thailand at a glance
Thailand is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and South Korea on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| South Korea | Thailand | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 80 | 62 (better) |
| At ground stationsCities with a current station reading. | 80 | 67 (better) |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 14% | 0% (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 436,000 ha (better) | 2.84 million ha |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 8.2% (better) | 14% |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 28.4% | 32.7% (better) |
Air quality today
Is Thailand cleaner than South Korea?
On air quality, yes, right now. Thailand has cleaner air than South Korea right now: its cities average AQI 62 against 80.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are South Korea 80 (56 cities) and Thailand 67 (28 cities).
14% of the measured cities in South Korea are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Thailand.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
South Korea
- Moderate48 (86%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups7 (13%)
- Unhealthy1 (2%)
Thailand
- Good5 (16%)
- Moderate26 (84%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do South Korea and Thailand compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of South Korea average cleaner air than 14% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Thailand than 33%.
Cleaner air than…
- South Korea
- Beats 14%
- Thailand
- Beats 33%
More tree cover than…
- South Korea
- Beats 64%
- Thailand
- Beats 73%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, South Korea or Thailand?
Thailand has lost more: about 2.84 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 436,000 ha in South Korea, or 6.5 times as much. 2.49 million ha of Thailand's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2025, with 87,000 ha lost.
Worst year: 2017, with 199,000 ha lost.
| South Korea | Thailand | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 436,000 ha (better) | 2.84 million ha |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 8.2% (better) | 14% |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 67,300 ha (better) | 2.49 million ha |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Speeding up | Holding steady |
| Main known cause | Logging (70%) | Farms, pasture and plantations (86%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, South Korea or Thailand?
Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 28.4%, a gap of 4.3 percentage points.
| South Korea | Thailand | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 4.8M (better) | 3.0M |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 59% | 42% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 1.3M | 286K (better) |
Behind the averages
The cities behind South Korea and Thailand
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Thailand
- Greenest measured city
- Kabin Buri64.4% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- Chon BuriAQI 85
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 56 in South Korea and 31 in Thailand, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. South Korea rests on 56 cities against 31, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
South Korea vs Thailand: your questions answered
Is Thailand cleaner than South Korea?
On air quality, yes, right now: Thailand's cities average AQI 62 against 80 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are South Korea 80 (56 cities) and Thailand 67 (28 cities).
Which country has lost more forest, South Korea or Thailand?
Thailand has lost more: about 2.84 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 436,000 ha in South Korea, or 6.5 times as much. 2.49 million ha of Thailand's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, South Korea or Thailand?
Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 28.4%, a gap of 4.3 percentage points.
How many cities are the South Korea and Thailand figures based on?
56 measured cities in South Korea and 31 in Thailand. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Why are there two air quality averages for each country?
The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.
Does this cover the whole of South Korea and Thailand?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for South Korea
More comparisons for Thailand
Build your own
Compare South Korea with somewhere else
This place
South Korea