Country comparison · 156 cities measured
Philippines vs South Korea Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Philippines has cleaner air than South Korea right now: its cities average AQI 43 against 80.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Philippines 68 (34 cities) and South Korea 80 (56 cities). Philippines has lost more forest since 2001. Philippines has more tree cover in its cities.
Average of 100 cities
AQI 43
Good
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 68
- Tree cover
- 40.9%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 1.53 million ha
Average of 56 cities
AQI 80
Moderate
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 80
- Tree cover
- 28.4%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 436,000 ha
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Philippines43South Korea80
Head to head
Philippines vs South Korea at a glance
Philippines and South Korea are level, each ahead on 3 of 6 measures. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Philippines | South Korea | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 43 (better) | 80 |
| At ground stationsCities with a current station reading. | 68 (better) | 80 |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 10% | 9% (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 1.53 million ha | 436,000 ha (better) |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 8.4% | 8.2% (better) |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 40.9% (better) | 28.4% |
Air quality today
Is Philippines cleaner than South Korea?
On air quality, yes, right now. Philippines has cleaner air than South Korea right now: its cities average AQI 43 against 80.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Philippines 68 (34 cities) and South Korea 80 (56 cities).
10% of the measured cities in the Philippines are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 9% in South Korea.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Philippines
- Good66 (66%)
- Moderate24 (24%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups5 (5%)
- Unhealthy5 (5%)
South Korea
- Good1 (2%)
- Moderate50 (89%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups5 (9%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Philippines and South Korea compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of the Philippines average cleaner air than 65% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of South Korea than 14%.
Cleaner air than…
- Philippines
- Beats 65%
- South Korea
- Beats 14%
More tree cover than…
- Philippines
- Beats 90%
- South Korea
- Beats 64%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Philippines or South Korea?
Philippines has lost more: about 1.53 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 436,000 ha in South Korea, or 3.5 times as much. 939,000 ha of Philippines's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2016, with 126,000 ha lost.
Worst year: 2025, with 87,000 ha lost.
| Philippines | South Korea | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 1.53 million ha | 436,000 ha (better) |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 8.4% | 8.2% (better) |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 939,000 ha | 67,300 ha (better) |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Slowing down | Speeding up |
| Main known cause | Farms, pasture and plantations (60%) | Logging (70%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Philippines or South Korea?
Philippines does: its measured cities average 40.9% tree cover against 28.4%, a gap of 12.5 percentage points.
| Philippines | South Korea | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 11.3M (better) | 4.8M |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 22% (better) | 57% |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 562K (better) | 1.3M |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Philippines and South Korea
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Philippines
- Greenest measured city
- Catbalogan74.4% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- San Jose del MonteAQI 162
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 100 in the Philippines and 56 in South Korea, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Philippines rests on 100 cities against 56, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Philippines vs South Korea: your questions answered
Is Philippines cleaner than South Korea?
On air quality, yes, right now: Philippines's cities average AQI 43 against 80 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Philippines 68 (34 cities) and South Korea 80 (56 cities).
Which country has lost more forest, Philippines or South Korea?
Philippines has lost more: about 1.53 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 436,000 ha in South Korea, or 3.5 times as much. 939,000 ha of Philippines's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Philippines or South Korea?
Philippines does: its measured cities average 40.9% tree cover against 28.4%, a gap of 12.5 percentage points.
How many cities are the Philippines and South Korea figures based on?
100 measured cities in the Philippines and 56 in South Korea. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Why are there two air quality averages for each country?
The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.
Does this cover the whole of the Philippines and South Korea?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Philippines
More comparisons for South Korea
Build your own
Compare Philippines with somewhere else
This place
Philippines