Country comparison · 227 cities measured
Pakistan vs Philippines Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Philippines has cleaner air than Pakistan right now: its cities average AQI 43 against 336.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Pakistan 301 (58 cities) and Philippines 70 (34 cities). Philippines has lost more forest since 2001. Philippines has more tree cover in its cities.
Average of 127 cities
AQI 336
Hazardous
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 301
- Tree cover
- 12.5%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 10,300 ha
Average of 100 cities
AQI 43
Good
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 70
- Tree cover
- 40.9%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 1.53 million ha
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Pakistan336Philippines43
Head to head
Pakistan vs Philippines at a glance
Philippines is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Pakistan on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Pakistan | Philippines | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 336 | 43 (better) |
| At ground stationsCities with a current station reading. | 301 | 70 (better) |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 86% | 10% (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 10,300 ha (better) | 1.53 million ha |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 1% (better) | 8.4% |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 12.5% | 40.9% (better) |
Air quality today
Is Philippines cleaner than Pakistan?
On air quality, yes, right now. Philippines has cleaner air than Pakistan right now: its cities average AQI 43 against 336.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Pakistan 301 (58 cities) and Philippines 70 (34 cities).
86% of the measured cities in Pakistan are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 10% in the Philippines.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Pakistan
- Good1 (1%)
- Moderate17 (13%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups15 (12%)
- Unhealthy23 (18%)
- Very unhealthy20 (16%)
- Hazardous51 (40%)
Philippines
- Good66 (66%)
- Moderate24 (24%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups5 (5%)
- Unhealthy5 (5%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Pakistan and Philippines compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of Pakistan average cleaner air than 0% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of the Philippines than 66%.
Cleaner air than…
- Pakistan
- Beats 0%
- Philippines
- Beats 66%
More tree cover than…
- Pakistan
- Beats 22%
- Philippines
- Beats 90%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Pakistan or Philippines?
Philippines has lost more: about 1.53 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 10,300 ha in Pakistan, or 148 times as much. 939,000 ha of Philippines's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2006, with 1,340 ha lost.
Worst year: 2016, with 126,000 ha lost.
| Pakistan | Philippines | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 10,300 ha (better) | 1.53 million ha |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 1% (better) | 8.4% |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 784 ha (better) | 939,000 ha |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Speeding up | Slowing down |
| Main known cause | Logging (69%) | Farms, pasture and plantations (60%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Pakistan or Philippines?
Philippines does: its measured cities average 40.9% tree cover against 12.5%, a gap of 28.4 percentage points.
| Pakistan | Philippines | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 5.0M | 11.3M (better) |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 95% | 24% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 11.5M | 585K (better) |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Pakistan and Philippines
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Philippines
- Greenest measured city
- Catbalogan74.4% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- BaliuagAQI 153
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 127 in Pakistan and 100 in the Philippines, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Pakistan rests on 127 cities against 100, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Pakistan vs Philippines: your questions answered
Is Philippines cleaner than Pakistan?
On air quality, yes, right now: Philippines's cities average AQI 43 against 336 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Pakistan 301 (58 cities) and Philippines 70 (34 cities).
Which country has lost more forest, Pakistan or Philippines?
Philippines has lost more: about 1.53 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 10,300 ha in Pakistan, or 148 times as much. 939,000 ha of Philippines's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Pakistan or Philippines?
Philippines does: its measured cities average 40.9% tree cover against 12.5%, a gap of 28.4 percentage points.
How many cities are the Pakistan and Philippines figures based on?
127 measured cities in Pakistan and 100 in the Philippines. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Why are there two air quality averages for each country?
The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.
Does this cover the whole of Pakistan and the Philippines?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Pakistan
More comparisons for Philippines
Build your own
Compare Pakistan with somewhere else
This place
Pakistan