Country comparison · 158 cities measured
Chile vs Pakistan Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Chile has cleaner air than Pakistan right now: its cities average AQI 52 against 320.
Chile has lost more forest since 2001. Chile has more tree cover in its cities.
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Chile52Pakistan320
Head to head
Chile vs Pakistan at a glance
Chile is ahead on 3 of 5 measures, and Pakistan on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Chile | Pakistan | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 52 (better) | 320 |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 0% (better) | 84% |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 2.43 million ha | 10,300 ha (better) |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 14% | 1% (better) |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 13.0% (better) | 12.5% |
Air quality today
Is Chile cleaner than Pakistan?
On air quality, yes, right now. Chile has cleaner air than Pakistan right now: its cities average AQI 52 against 320.
0% of the measured cities in Chile are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 84% in Pakistan.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Chile
- Good13 (42%)
- Moderate18 (58%)
Pakistan
- Good1 (1%)
- Moderate19 (15%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups20 (16%)
- Unhealthy19 (15%)
- Very unhealthy20 (16%)
- Hazardous48 (38%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Chile and Pakistan compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of Chile average cleaner air than 50% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Pakistan than 0%.
Cleaner air than…
- Chile
- Beats 50%
- Pakistan
- Beats 0%
More tree cover than…
- Chile
- Beats 25%
- Pakistan
- Beats 22%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Chile or Pakistan?
Chile has lost more: about 2.43 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 10,300 ha in Pakistan, or 235 times as much. 96,100 ha of Chile's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2017, with 214,000 ha lost.
Worst year: 2006, with 1,340 ha lost.
| Chile | Pakistan | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 2.43 million ha | 10,300 ha (better) |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 14% | 1% (better) |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 96,100 ha | 784 ha (better) |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Slowing down | Speeding up |
| Main known cause | Logging (82%) | Logging (69%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Chile or Pakistan?
Chile does: its measured cities average 13.0% tree cover against 12.5%, a gap of 0.5 percentage points.
| Chile | Pakistan | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 1.2M | 5.0M (better) |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 94% (better) | 95% |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 1.5M (better) | 11.3M |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Chile and Pakistan
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 31 in Chile and 127 in Pakistan, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Pakistan rests on 127 cities against 31, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Chile vs Pakistan: your questions answered
Is Chile cleaner than Pakistan?
On air quality, yes, right now: Chile's cities average AQI 52 against 320 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather.
Which country has lost more forest, Chile or Pakistan?
Chile has lost more: about 2.43 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 10,300 ha in Pakistan, or 235 times as much. 96,100 ha of Chile's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Chile or Pakistan?
Chile does: its measured cities average 13.0% tree cover against 12.5%, a gap of 0.5 percentage points.
How many cities are the Chile and Pakistan figures based on?
31 measured cities in Chile and 127 in Pakistan. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Does this cover the whole of Chile and Pakistan?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Chile
More comparisons for Pakistan
Build your own
Compare Chile with somewhere else
This place
Chile