Country comparison · 68 cities measured
Argentina vs Chile Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Argentina has cleaner air than Chile right now: its cities average AQI 37 against 60.
Argentina has lost more forest since 2001. Argentina has more tree cover in its cities.
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Argentina37Chile60
Head to head
Argentina vs Chile at a glance
Argentina is ahead on 3 of 5 measures, and Chile on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Argentina | Chile | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 37 (better) | 60 |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 3% (better) | 6% |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 7.18 million ha | 2.43 million ha (better) |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 18% | 14% (better) |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 18.2% (better) | 12.9% |
Air quality today
Is Argentina cleaner than Chile?
On air quality, yes, right now. Argentina has cleaner air than Chile right now: its cities average AQI 37 against 60.
3% of the measured cities in Argentina are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 6% in Chile.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Argentina
- Good30 (81%)
- Moderate6 (16%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups1 (3%)
Chile
- Good12 (39%)
- Moderate17 (55%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups2 (6%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Argentina and Chile compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of Argentina average cleaner air than 75% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Chile than 38%.
Cleaner air than…
- Argentina
- Beats 75%
- Chile
- Beats 38%
More tree cover than…
- Argentina
- Beats 37%
- Chile
- Beats 25%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Chile?
Argentina has lost more: about 7.18 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.43 million ha in Chile, or 3 times as much. 5.72 million ha of Argentina's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2008, with 594,000 ha lost.
Worst year: 2017, with 214,000 ha lost.
| Argentina | Chile | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 7.18 million ha | 2.43 million ha (better) |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 18% | 14% (better) |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 5.72 million ha | 96,100 ha (better) |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Holding steady | Slowing down |
| Main known cause | Farms, pasture and plantations (79%) | Logging (82%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Chile?
Argentina does: its measured cities average 18.2% tree cover against 12.9%, a gap of 5.3 percentage points.
| Argentina | Chile | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 2.0M (better) | 1.2M |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 89% (better) | 94% |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 1.5M (better) | 1.6M |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Argentina and Chile
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Argentina
- Greenest measured city
- Ituzaingó63.5% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- San Salvador de JujuyAQI 86
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 37 in Argentina and 31 in Chile, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Argentina rests on 37 cities against 31, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Argentina vs Chile: your questions answered
Is Argentina cleaner than Chile?
On air quality, yes, right now: Argentina's cities average AQI 37 against 60 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather.
Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Chile?
Argentina has lost more: about 7.18 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.43 million ha in Chile, or 3 times as much. 5.72 million ha of Argentina's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Chile?
Argentina does: its measured cities average 18.2% tree cover against 12.9%, a gap of 5.3 percentage points.
How many cities are the Argentina and Chile figures based on?
37 measured cities in Argentina and 31 in Chile. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Does this cover the whole of Argentina and Chile?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Argentina
More comparisons for Chile
Build your own
Compare Argentina with somewhere else
This place
Argentina