Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 70 cities measured

Argentina vs Myanmar Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Myanmar has cleaner air than Argentina right now: its cities average AQI 19 against 37.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Myanmar 14 (3 cities). Argentina has lost more forest since 2001. Myanmar has more tree cover in its cities.

Argentina

Average of 37 cities

AQI 37

Good

At ground stations
AQI 62
Tree cover
18.2%
Forest lost since 2001
7.18 million ha
Myanmar

Average of 33 cities

AQI 19

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 14
Tree cover
44.4%
Forest lost since 2001
5.35 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Argentina vs Myanmar at a glance

Myanmar is ahead on 6 of 6 measures, and Argentina on 0. The better figure in each row is marked.

Argentina and Myanmar compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
ArgentinaMyanmar
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.3719 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.6214 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.3%0% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.7.18 million ha5.35 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.18%13% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.18.2%44.4% (better)

Air quality today

Is Myanmar cleaner than Argentina?

On air quality, yes, right now. Myanmar has cleaner air than Argentina right now: its cities average AQI 19 against 37.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Myanmar 14 (3 cities).

3% of the measured cities in Argentina are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Myanmar.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Argentina

  • Good30 (81%)
  • Moderate6 (16%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups1 (3%)

Myanmar

  • Good30 (91%)
  • Moderate3 (9%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Argentina and Myanmar compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Argentina average cleaner air than 75% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Myanmar than 99%.

Cleaner air than…

Argentina
Beats 75%
Myanmar
Beats 99%

More tree cover than…

Argentina
Beats 37%
Myanmar
Beats 95%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Myanmar?

Argentina has lost more: about 7.18 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 5.35 million ha in Myanmar, or 1.3 times as much. 5.72 million ha of Argentina's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Argentina
20012025

Worst year: 2008, with 594,000 ha lost.

Myanmar
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 363,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Argentina and Myanmar, 2001 to 2025
ArgentinaMyanmar
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.7.18 million ha5.35 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.18%13% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.5.72 million ha2 million ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (79%)Shifting farming (61%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Myanmar?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 18.2%, a gap of 26.2 percentage points.

Argentina18.2%
Myanmar44.4%
Tree figures for Argentina and Myanmar
ArgentinaMyanmar
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.2.0M4.2M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.89%15% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.1.5M133K (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Argentina and Myanmar

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Argentina

Greenest measured city
Ituzaingó63.5% tree cover
Worst air right now
San Salvador de JujuyAQI 86

Myanmar

Greenest measured city
Thandwe66.3% tree cover
Worst air right now
MingaladonAQI 14

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 37 in Argentina and 33 in Myanmar, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Argentina rests on 37 cities against 33, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Argentina vs Myanmar: your questions answered

Is Myanmar cleaner than Argentina?

On air quality, yes, right now: Myanmar's cities average AQI 19 against 37 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Myanmar 14 (3 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Myanmar?

Argentina has lost more: about 7.18 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 5.35 million ha in Myanmar, or 1.3 times as much. 5.72 million ha of Argentina's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Myanmar?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 18.2%, a gap of 26.2 percentage points.

How many cities are the Argentina and Myanmar figures based on?

37 measured cities in Argentina and 33 in Myanmar. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Argentina and Myanmar?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Argentina

More comparisons for Myanmar

Build your own

Compare Argentina with somewhere else

This place

Argentina