Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 147 cities measured

Mexico vs Myanmar Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Myanmar has cleaner air than Mexico right now: its cities average AQI 19 against 69.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Mexico 91 (46 cities) and Myanmar 14 (3 cities). Mexico has lost more forest since 2001. Myanmar has more tree cover in its cities.

Mexico

Average of 114 cities

AQI 69

Moderate

At ground stations
AQI 91
Tree cover
14.6%
Forest lost since 2001
5.46 million ha
Myanmar

Average of 33 cities

AQI 19

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 14
Tree cover
44.4%
Forest lost since 2001
5.35 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Mexico vs Myanmar at a glance

Myanmar is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Mexico on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Mexico and Myanmar compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
MexicoMyanmar
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.6919 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.9114 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.22%0% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.5.46 million ha5.35 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.10% (better)13%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.14.6%44.4% (better)

Air quality today

Is Myanmar cleaner than Mexico?

On air quality, yes, right now. Myanmar has cleaner air than Mexico right now: its cities average AQI 19 against 69.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Mexico 91 (46 cities) and Myanmar 14 (3 cities).

22% of the measured cities in Mexico are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Myanmar.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Mexico

  • Good38 (33%)
  • Moderate51 (45%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups24 (21%)
  • Unhealthy1 (1%)

Myanmar

  • Good30 (91%)
  • Moderate3 (9%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Mexico and Myanmar compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Mexico average cleaner air than 25% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Myanmar than 99%.

Cleaner air than…

Mexico
Beats 25%
Myanmar
Beats 99%

More tree cover than…

Mexico
Beats 29%
Myanmar
Beats 95%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Mexico or Myanmar?

Mexico has lost more: about 5.46 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 5.35 million ha in Myanmar. 4.39 million ha of Mexico's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Mexico
20012025

Worst year: 2024, with 332,000 ha lost.

Myanmar
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 363,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Mexico and Myanmar, 2001 to 2025
MexicoMyanmar
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.5.46 million ha5.35 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.10% (better)13%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.4.39 million ha2 million ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (79%)Shifting farming (61%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Mexico or Myanmar?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 14.6%, a gap of 29.8 percentage points.

Mexico14.6%
Myanmar44.4%
Tree figures for Mexico and Myanmar
MexicoMyanmar
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.5.1M (better)4.2M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.94%15% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.6.1M133K (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Mexico and Myanmar

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Mexico

Greenest measured city
Teziutlan52.6% tree cover
Worst air right now
TuxtlaAQI 146

Myanmar

Greenest measured city
Thandwe66.3% tree cover
Worst air right now
MingaladonAQI 14

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 114 in Mexico and 33 in Myanmar, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Mexico rests on 114 cities against 33, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Mexico vs Myanmar: your questions answered

Is Myanmar cleaner than Mexico?

On air quality, yes, right now: Myanmar's cities average AQI 19 against 69 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Mexico 91 (46 cities) and Myanmar 14 (3 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Mexico or Myanmar?

Mexico has lost more: about 5.46 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 5.35 million ha in Myanmar. 4.39 million ha of Mexico's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Mexico or Myanmar?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 14.6%, a gap of 29.8 percentage points.

How many cities are the Mexico and Myanmar figures based on?

114 measured cities in Mexico and 33 in Myanmar. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Mexico and Myanmar?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Mexico

More comparisons for Myanmar

Build your own

Compare Mexico with somewhere else

This place

Mexico