Country comparison · 151 cities measured
Argentina vs Mexico Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Argentina has cleaner air than Mexico right now: its cities average AQI 28 against 60.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 21 (8 cities) and Mexico 81 (46 cities). Argentina has lost more forest since 2001. Argentina has more tree cover in its cities.
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Argentina28Mexico60
Head to head
Argentina vs Mexico at a glance
Argentina is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Mexico on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Argentina | Mexico | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 28 (better) | 60 |
| At ground stationsCities with a current station reading. | 21 (better) | 81 |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 0% (better) | 9% |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 7.18 million ha | 5.46 million ha (better) |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 18% | 10% (better) |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 18.2% (better) | 14.6% |
Air quality today
Is Argentina cleaner than Mexico?
On air quality, yes, right now. Argentina has cleaner air than Mexico right now: its cities average AQI 28 against 60.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 21 (8 cities) and Mexico 81 (46 cities).
0% of the measured cities in Argentina are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 9% in Mexico.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Argentina
- Good31 (84%)
- Moderate6 (16%)
Mexico
- Good45 (39%)
- Moderate59 (52%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups10 (9%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Argentina and Mexico compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of Argentina average cleaner air than 89% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Mexico than 35%.
Cleaner air than…
- Argentina
- Beats 89%
- Mexico
- Beats 35%
More tree cover than…
- Argentina
- Beats 37%
- Mexico
- Beats 29%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Mexico?
Argentina has lost more: about 7.18 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 5.46 million ha in Mexico, or 1.3 times as much. 5.72 million ha of Argentina's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2008, with 594,000 ha lost.
Worst year: 2024, with 332,000 ha lost.
| Argentina | Mexico | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 7.18 million ha | 5.46 million ha (better) |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 18% | 10% (better) |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 5.72 million ha | 4.39 million ha (better) |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Holding steady | Holding steady |
| Main known cause | Farms, pasture and plantations (79%) | Farms, pasture and plantations (79%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Mexico?
Argentina does: its measured cities average 18.2% tree cover against 14.6%, a gap of 3.6 percentage points.
| Argentina | Mexico | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 2.0M | 5.1M (better) |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 89% (better) | 93% |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 1.5M (better) | 5.9M |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Argentina and Mexico
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Argentina
- Greenest measured city
- Ituzaingó63.5% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- Santiago del EsteroAQI 87
Mexico
- Greenest measured city
- Teziutlan52.6% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- Texcoco de MoraAQI 122
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 37 in Argentina and 114 in Mexico, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Mexico rests on 114 cities against 37, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Argentina vs Mexico: your questions answered
Is Argentina cleaner than Mexico?
On air quality, yes, right now: Argentina's cities average AQI 28 against 60 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 21 (8 cities) and Mexico 81 (46 cities).
Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Mexico?
Argentina has lost more: about 7.18 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 5.46 million ha in Mexico, or 1.3 times as much. 5.72 million ha of Argentina's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Mexico?
Argentina does: its measured cities average 18.2% tree cover against 14.6%, a gap of 3.6 percentage points.
How many cities are the Argentina and Mexico figures based on?
37 measured cities in Argentina and 114 in Mexico. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Why are there two air quality averages for each country?
The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.
Does this cover the whole of Argentina and Mexico?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Argentina
More comparisons for Mexico
Build your own
Compare Argentina with somewhere else
This place
Argentina