Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 244 cities measured

Argentina vs Japan Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Argentina has cleaner air than Japan right now: its cities average AQI 37 against 47.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Japan 48 (193 cities), which puts Japan ahead instead. Argentina has lost more forest since 2001. Argentina has more tree cover in its cities.

Argentina

Average of 37 cities

AQI 37

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 62
Tree cover
18.2%
Forest lost since 2001
7.18 million ha
Japan

Average of 207 cities

AQI 47

Good

At ground stations
AQI 48
Tree cover
16.4%
Forest lost since 2001
1.02 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Argentina vs Japan at a glance

Japan is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Argentina on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Argentina and Japan compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
ArgentinaJapan
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.37 (better)47
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.6248 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.3%0% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.7.18 million ha1.02 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.18%3.9% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.18.2% (better)16.4%

Air quality today

Is Argentina cleaner than Japan?

On air quality, yes, right now. Argentina has cleaner air than Japan right now: its cities average AQI 37 against 47.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Japan 48 (193 cities), which puts Japan ahead instead.

3% of the measured cities in Argentina are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Japan.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Argentina

  • Good30 (81%)
  • Moderate6 (16%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups1 (3%)

Japan

  • Good102 (49%)
  • Moderate105 (51%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Argentina and Japan compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Argentina average cleaner air than 75% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Japan than 58%.

Cleaner air than…

Argentina
Beats 75%
Japan
Beats 58%

More tree cover than…

Argentina
Beats 37%
Japan
Beats 33%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Japan?

Argentina has lost more: about 7.18 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 7.1 times as much. 5.72 million ha of Argentina's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Argentina
20012025

Worst year: 2008, with 594,000 ha lost.

Japan
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 54,800 ha lost.

Forest loss in Argentina and Japan, 2001 to 2025
ArgentinaJapan
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.7.18 million ha1.02 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.18%3.9% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.5.72 million ha108,000 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (79%)Logging (87%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Japan?

Argentina does: its measured cities average 18.2% tree cover against 16.4%, a gap of 1.8 percentage points.

Argentina18.2%
Japan16.4%
Tree figures for Argentina and Japan
ArgentinaJapan
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.2.0M10.2M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.89%82% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.1.5M (better)9.6M

Behind the averages

The cities behind Argentina and Japan

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Argentina

Greenest measured city
Ituzaingó63.5% tree cover
Worst air right now
San Salvador de JujuyAQI 86

Japan

Greenest measured city
Ōme74.7% tree cover
Worst air right now
SagaAQI 94

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 37 in Argentina and 207 in Japan, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Japan rests on 207 cities against 37, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Argentina vs Japan: your questions answered

Is Argentina cleaner than Japan?

On air quality, yes, right now: Argentina's cities average AQI 37 against 47 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Japan 48 (193 cities), which puts Japan ahead instead.

Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Japan?

Argentina has lost more: about 7.18 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 7.1 times as much. 5.72 million ha of Argentina's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Japan?

Argentina does: its measured cities average 18.2% tree cover against 16.4%, a gap of 1.8 percentage points.

How many cities are the Argentina and Japan figures based on?

37 measured cities in Argentina and 207 in Japan. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Argentina and Japan?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Argentina

More comparisons for Japan

Build your own

Compare Argentina with somewhere else

This place

Argentina