Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 363 cities measured

Indonesia vs Japan Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Japan has cleaner air than Indonesia right now: its cities average AQI 47 against 81.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Indonesia 96 (39 cities) and Japan 48 (193 cities). Indonesia has lost more forest since 2001. Indonesia has more tree cover in its cities.

Indonesia

Average of 156 cities

AQI 81

Moderate

At ground stations
AQI 96
Tree cover
28.0%
Forest lost since 2001
33 million ha
Japan

Average of 207 cities

AQI 47

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 48
Tree cover
16.4%
Forest lost since 2001
1.02 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Indonesia vs Japan at a glance

Japan is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Indonesia on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Indonesia and Japan compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
IndonesiaJapan
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.8147 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.9648 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.19%0% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.33 million ha1.02 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.21%3.9% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.28.0% (better)16.4%

Air quality today

Is Japan cleaner than Indonesia?

On air quality, yes, right now. Japan has cleaner air than Indonesia right now: its cities average AQI 47 against 81.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Indonesia 96 (39 cities) and Japan 48 (193 cities).

19% of the measured cities in Indonesia are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Japan.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Indonesia

  • Good31 (20%)
  • Moderate95 (61%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups14 (9%)
  • Unhealthy15 (10%)
  • Very unhealthy1 (1%)

Japan

  • Good102 (49%)
  • Moderate105 (51%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Indonesia and Japan compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Indonesia average cleaner air than 12% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Japan than 58%.

Cleaner air than…

Indonesia
Beats 12%
Japan
Beats 58%

More tree cover than…

Indonesia
Beats 61%
Japan
Beats 33%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Indonesia or Japan?

Indonesia has lost more: about 33 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 32 times as much. 25 million ha of Indonesia's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Indonesia
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 2.41 million ha lost.

Japan
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 54,800 ha lost.

Forest loss in Indonesia and Japan, 2001 to 2025
IndonesiaJapan
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.33 million ha1.02 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.21%3.9% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.25 million ha108,000 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (73%)Logging (87%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Indonesia or Japan?

Indonesia does: its measured cities average 28.0% tree cover against 16.4%, a gap of 11.6 percentage points.

Indonesia28.0%
Japan16.4%
Tree figures for Indonesia and Japan
IndonesiaJapan
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.12.9M (better)10.2M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.67% (better)82%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.3.9M (better)9.6M

Behind the averages

The cities behind Indonesia and Japan

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Indonesia

Greenest measured city
Subulussalam75.8% tree cover
Worst air right now
ParungAQI 153

Japan

Greenest measured city
Ōme74.7% tree cover
Worst air right now
SagaAQI 94

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 156 in Indonesia and 207 in Japan, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Japan rests on 207 cities against 156, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Indonesia vs Japan: your questions answered

Is Japan cleaner than Indonesia?

On air quality, yes, right now: Japan's cities average AQI 47 against 81 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Indonesia 96 (39 cities) and Japan 48 (193 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Indonesia or Japan?

Indonesia has lost more: about 33 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 32 times as much. 25 million ha of Indonesia's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Indonesia or Japan?

Indonesia does: its measured cities average 28.0% tree cover against 16.4%, a gap of 11.6 percentage points.

How many cities are the Indonesia and Japan figures based on?

156 measured cities in Indonesia and 207 in Japan. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Indonesia and Japan?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Indonesia

More comparisons for Japan

Build your own

Compare Indonesia with somewhere else

This place

Indonesia