Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 278 cities measured

Germany vs Japan Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Japan has cleaner air than Germany right now: its cities average AQI 49 against 55.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Germany 54 (69 cities) and Japan 50 (193 cities). Germany has lost more forest since 2001. Germany has more tree cover in its cities.

Germany

Average of 71 cities

AQI 55

Moderate

At ground stations
AQI 54
Tree cover
38.4%
Forest lost since 2001
1.49 million ha
Japan

Average of 207 cities

AQI 49

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 50
Tree cover
16.4%
Forest lost since 2001
1.02 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Germany vs Japan at a glance

Japan is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Germany on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Germany and Japan compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
GermanyJapan
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.5549 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.5450 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.0% (better)0%
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.1.49 million ha1.02 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.12%3.9% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.38.4% (better)16.4%

Air quality today

Is Japan cleaner than Germany?

On air quality, yes, right now. Japan has cleaner air than Germany right now: its cities average AQI 49 against 55.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Germany 54 (69 cities) and Japan 50 (193 cities).

0% of the measured cities in Germany are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Japan.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Germany

  • Good28 (39%)
  • Moderate43 (61%)

Japan

  • Good107 (52%)
  • Moderate99 (48%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups1 (0%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Germany and Japan compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Germany average cleaner air than 44% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Japan than 55%.

Cleaner air than…

Germany
Beats 44%
Japan
Beats 55%

More tree cover than…

Germany
Beats 85%
Japan
Beats 33%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Germany or Japan?

Germany has lost more: about 1.49 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 1.5 times as much. 43,700 ha of Germany's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Germany
20012025

Worst year: 2021, with 202,000 ha lost.

Japan
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 54,800 ha lost.

Forest loss in Germany and Japan, 2001 to 2025
GermanyJapan
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.1.49 million ha1.02 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.12%3.9% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.43,700 ha (better)108,000 ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Speeding upHolding steady
Main known causeLogging (96%)Logging (87%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Germany or Japan?

Germany does: its measured cities average 38.4% tree cover against 16.4%, a gap of 22.0 percentage points.

Germany38.4%
Japan16.4%
Tree figures for Germany and Japan
GermanyJapan
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.8.3M10.2M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.17% (better)82%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.175K (better)9.6M

Behind the averages

The cities behind Germany and Japan

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Germany

Greenest measured city
Bergisch Gladbach59.9% tree cover
Worst air right now
EssenAQI 97

Japan

Greenest measured city
Ōme74.7% tree cover
Worst air right now
SagaAQI 110

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 71 in Germany and 207 in Japan, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Japan rests on 207 cities against 71, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Germany vs Japan: your questions answered

Is Japan cleaner than Germany?

On air quality, yes, right now: Japan's cities average AQI 49 against 55 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Germany 54 (69 cities) and Japan 50 (193 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Germany or Japan?

Germany has lost more: about 1.49 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 1.5 times as much. 43,700 ha of Germany's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Germany or Japan?

Germany does: its measured cities average 38.4% tree cover against 16.4%, a gap of 22.0 percentage points.

How many cities are the Germany and Japan figures based on?

71 measured cities in Germany and 207 in Japan. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Germany and Japan?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Germany

More comparisons for Japan

Build your own

Compare Germany with somewhere else

This place

Germany