Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 321 cities measured

Japan vs Vietnam Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Japan has cleaner air than Vietnam right now: its cities average AQI 47 against 53.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Japan 48 (193 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities). Vietnam has lost more forest since 2001. Vietnam has more tree cover in its cities.

Japan

Average of 207 cities

AQI 47

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 48
Tree cover
16.4%
Forest lost since 2001
1.02 million ha
Vietnam

Average of 114 cities

AQI 53

Moderate

At ground stations
AQI 77
Tree cover
35.8%
Forest lost since 2001
3.85 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Japan vs Vietnam at a glance

Japan is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Vietnam on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Japan and Vietnam compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
JapanVietnam
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.47 (better)53
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.48 (better)77
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.0% (better)9%
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.1.02 million ha (better)3.85 million ha
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.3.9% (better)23%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.16.4%35.8% (better)

Air quality today

Is Japan cleaner than Vietnam?

On air quality, yes, right now. Japan has cleaner air than Vietnam right now: its cities average AQI 47 against 53.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Japan 48 (193 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities).

0% of the measured cities in Japan are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 9% in Vietnam.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Japan

  • Good102 (49%)
  • Moderate105 (51%)

Vietnam

  • Good43 (38%)
  • Moderate61 (54%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups7 (6%)
  • Unhealthy3 (3%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Japan and Vietnam compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Japan average cleaner air than 58% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Vietnam than 48%.

Cleaner air than…

Japan
Beats 58%
Vietnam
Beats 48%

More tree cover than…

Japan
Beats 33%
Vietnam
Beats 79%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Japan or Vietnam?

Vietnam has lost more: about 3.85 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 3.8 times as much. 1.41 million ha of Vietnam's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Japan
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 54,800 ha lost.

Vietnam
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 357,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Japan and Vietnam, 2001 to 2025
JapanVietnam
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.1.02 million ha (better)3.85 million ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.3.9% (better)23%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.108,000 ha (better)1.41 million ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadySlowing down
Main known causeLogging (87%)Logging (47%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Japan or Vietnam?

Vietnam does: its measured cities average 35.8% tree cover against 16.4%, a gap of 19.4 percentage points.

Japan16.4%
Vietnam35.8%
Tree figures for Japan and Vietnam
JapanVietnam
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.10.2M12.0M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.82%44% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.9.6M1.4M (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Japan and Vietnam

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Japan

Greenest measured city
Ōme74.7% tree cover
Worst air right now
SagaAQI 94

Vietnam

Greenest measured city
Thị Trấn Thuận Châu82.6% tree cover
Worst air right now
Phúc YênAQI 152

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 207 in Japan and 114 in Vietnam, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Japan rests on 207 cities against 114, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Japan vs Vietnam: your questions answered

Is Japan cleaner than Vietnam?

On air quality, yes, right now: Japan's cities average AQI 47 against 53 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Japan 48 (193 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Japan or Vietnam?

Vietnam has lost more: about 3.85 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 3.8 times as much. 1.41 million ha of Vietnam's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Japan or Vietnam?

Vietnam does: its measured cities average 35.8% tree cover against 16.4%, a gap of 19.4 percentage points.

How many cities are the Japan and Vietnam figures based on?

207 measured cities in Japan and 114 in Vietnam. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Japan and Vietnam?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Japan

More comparisons for Vietnam

Build your own

Compare Japan with somewhere else

This place

Japan