Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 153 cities measured

Poland vs Vietnam Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Vietnam has cleaner air than Poland right now: its cities average AQI 60 against 69.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Poland 71 (33 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities), which puts Poland ahead instead. Vietnam has lost more forest since 2001. Poland has more tree cover in its cities.

Poland

Average of 39 cities

AQI 69

Moderate

At ground stations
AQI 71
Tree cover
37.6%
Forest lost since 2001
1.52 million ha
Vietnam

Average of 114 cities

AQI 60

Moderate

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 77
Tree cover
35.8%
Forest lost since 2001
3.85 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Poland vs Vietnam at a glance

Poland is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Vietnam on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Poland and Vietnam compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
PolandVietnam
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.6960 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.71 (better)77
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.10%6% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.1.52 million ha (better)3.85 million ha
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.15% (better)23%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.37.6% (better)35.8%

Air quality today

Is Vietnam cleaner than Poland?

On air quality, yes, right now. Vietnam has cleaner air than Poland right now: its cities average AQI 60 against 69.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Poland 71 (33 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities), which puts Poland ahead instead.

10% of the measured cities in Poland are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 6% in Vietnam.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Poland

  • Good7 (18%)
  • Moderate28 (72%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups4 (10%)

Vietnam

  • Good36 (32%)
  • Moderate71 (62%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups4 (4%)
  • Unhealthy3 (3%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Poland and Vietnam compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Poland average cleaner air than 26% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Vietnam than 37%.

Cleaner air than…

Poland
Beats 26%
Vietnam
Beats 37%

More tree cover than…

Poland
Beats 82%
Vietnam
Beats 79%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Poland or Vietnam?

Vietnam has lost more: about 3.85 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.52 million ha in Poland, or 2.5 times as much. 1.41 million ha of Vietnam's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Poland
20012025

Worst year: 2018, with 96,800 ha lost.

Vietnam
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 357,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Poland and Vietnam, 2001 to 2025
PolandVietnam
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.1.52 million ha (better)3.85 million ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.15% (better)23%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.35,100 ha (better)1.41 million ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadySlowing down
Main known causeLogging (97%)Logging (47%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Poland or Vietnam?

Poland does: its measured cities average 37.6% tree cover against 35.8%, a gap of 1.9 percentage points.

Poland37.6%
Vietnam35.8%
Tree figures for Poland and Vietnam
PolandVietnam
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.4.5M12.0M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.26% (better)45%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.85.0K (better)1.4M

Behind the averages

The cities behind Poland and Vietnam

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Poland

Greenest measured city
Wałbrzych62.3% tree cover
Worst air right now
BydgoszczAQI 134

Vietnam

Greenest measured city
Thị Trấn Thuận Châu82.6% tree cover
Worst air right now
Phúc YênAQI 158

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 39 in Poland and 114 in Vietnam, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Vietnam rests on 114 cities against 39, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Poland vs Vietnam: your questions answered

Is Vietnam cleaner than Poland?

On air quality, yes, right now: Vietnam's cities average AQI 60 against 69 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Poland 71 (33 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities), which puts Poland ahead instead.

Which country has lost more forest, Poland or Vietnam?

Vietnam has lost more: about 3.85 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.52 million ha in Poland, or 2.5 times as much. 1.41 million ha of Vietnam's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Poland or Vietnam?

Poland does: its measured cities average 37.6% tree cover against 35.8%, a gap of 1.9 percentage points.

How many cities are the Poland and Vietnam figures based on?

39 measured cities in Poland and 114 in Vietnam. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Poland and Vietnam?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Poland

More comparisons for Vietnam

Build your own

Compare Poland with somewhere else

This place

Poland