Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 134 cities measured

Poland vs Turkey Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Poland has cleaner air than Turkey right now: its cities average AQI 70 against 84.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Poland 68 (28 cities) and Turkey 82 (67 cities). Poland has lost more forest since 2001. Poland has more tree cover in its cities.

Poland

Average of 39 cities

AQI 70

Moderate

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 68
Tree cover
37.6%
Forest lost since 2001
1.52 million ha
Turkey

Average of 95 cities

AQI 84

Moderate

At ground stations
AQI 82
Tree cover
14.2%
Forest lost since 2001
843,000 ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Poland vs Turkey at a glance

Poland is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Turkey on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Poland and Turkey compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
PolandTurkey
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.70 (better)84
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.68 (better)82
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.10% (better)20%
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.1.52 million ha843,000 ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.15%8.4% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.37.6% (better)14.2%

Air quality today

Is Poland cleaner than Turkey?

On air quality, yes, right now. Poland has cleaner air than Turkey right now: its cities average AQI 70 against 84.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Poland 68 (28 cities) and Turkey 82 (67 cities).

10% of the measured cities in Poland are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 20% in Turkey.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Poland

  • Good7 (18%)
  • Moderate28 (72%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups4 (10%)

Turkey

  • Good4 (4%)
  • Moderate72 (76%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups11 (12%)
  • Unhealthy8 (8%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Poland and Turkey compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Poland average cleaner air than 22% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Turkey than 11%.

Cleaner air than…

Poland
Beats 22%
Turkey
Beats 11%

More tree cover than…

Poland
Beats 82%
Turkey
Beats 27%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Poland or Turkey?

Poland has lost more: about 1.52 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 843,000 ha in Turkey, or 1.8 times as much. 35,100 ha of Poland's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Poland
20012025

Worst year: 2018, with 96,800 ha lost.

Turkey
20012025

Worst year: 2021, with 79,200 ha lost.

Forest loss in Poland and Turkey, 2001 to 2025
PolandTurkey
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.1.52 million ha843,000 ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.15%8.4% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.35,100 ha (better)88,400 ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadySpeeding up
Main known causeLogging (97%)Logging (68%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Poland or Turkey?

Poland does: its measured cities average 37.6% tree cover against 14.2%, a gap of 23.4 percentage points.

Poland37.6%
Turkey14.2%
Tree figures for Poland and Turkey
PolandTurkey
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.4.5M (better)3.9M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.28% (better)89%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.93.7K (better)5.4M

Behind the averages

The cities behind Poland and Turkey

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Poland

Greenest measured city
Wałbrzych62.3% tree cover
Worst air right now
BydgoszczAQI 134

Turkey

Greenest measured city
Rize68.5% tree cover
Worst air right now
IğdırAQI 192

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 39 in Poland and 95 in Turkey, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Turkey rests on 95 cities against 39, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Poland vs Turkey: your questions answered

Is Poland cleaner than Turkey?

On air quality, yes, right now: Poland's cities average AQI 70 against 84 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Poland 68 (28 cities) and Turkey 82 (67 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Poland or Turkey?

Poland has lost more: about 1.52 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 843,000 ha in Turkey, or 1.8 times as much. 35,100 ha of Poland's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Poland or Turkey?

Poland does: its measured cities average 37.6% tree cover against 14.2%, a gap of 23.4 percentage points.

How many cities are the Poland and Turkey figures based on?

39 measured cities in Poland and 95 in Turkey. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Poland and Turkey?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Poland

More comparisons for Turkey

Build your own

Compare Poland with somewhere else

This place

Poland