Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 110 cities measured

Germany vs Poland Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Germany has cleaner air than Poland right now: its cities average AQI 49 against 73.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Germany 49 (70 cities) and Poland 79 (31 cities). Poland has lost more forest since 2001. Germany has more tree cover in its cities.

Germany

Average of 71 cities

AQI 49

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 49
Tree cover
38.4%
Forest lost since 2001
1.49 million ha
Poland

Average of 39 cities

AQI 73

Moderate

At ground stations
AQI 79
Tree cover
37.6%
Forest lost since 2001
1.52 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Germany vs Poland at a glance

Germany is ahead on 6 of 6 measures, and Poland on 0. The better figure in each row is marked.

Germany and Poland compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
GermanyPoland
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.49 (better)73
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.49 (better)79
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.3% (better)13%
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.1.49 million ha (better)1.52 million ha
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.12% (better)15%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.38.4% (better)37.6%

Air quality today

Is Germany cleaner than Poland?

On air quality, yes, right now. Germany has cleaner air than Poland right now: its cities average AQI 49 against 73.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Germany 49 (70 cities) and Poland 79 (31 cities).

3% of the measured cities in Germany are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 13% in Poland.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Germany

  • Good30 (42%)
  • Moderate39 (55%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups2 (3%)

Poland

  • Good7 (18%)
  • Moderate27 (69%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups5 (13%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Germany and Poland compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Germany average cleaner air than 53% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Poland than 21%.

Cleaner air than…

Germany
Beats 53%
Poland
Beats 21%

More tree cover than…

Germany
Beats 85%
Poland
Beats 82%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Germany or Poland?

Poland has lost more: about 1.52 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.49 million ha in Germany. 35,100 ha of Poland's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Germany
20012025

Worst year: 2021, with 202,000 ha lost.

Poland
20012025

Worst year: 2018, with 96,800 ha lost.

Forest loss in Germany and Poland, 2001 to 2025
GermanyPoland
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.1.49 million ha (better)1.52 million ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.12% (better)15%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.43,700 ha35,100 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Speeding upHolding steady
Main known causeLogging (96%)Logging (97%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Germany or Poland?

Germany does: its measured cities average 38.4% tree cover against 37.6%, a gap of 0.8 percentage points.

Germany38.4%
Poland37.6%
Tree figures for Germany and Poland
GermanyPoland
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.8.3M (better)4.5M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.17% (better)26%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.190K85.0K (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Germany and Poland

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Germany

Greenest measured city
Bergisch Gladbach59.9% tree cover
Worst air right now
RegensburgAQI 127

Poland

Greenest measured city
Wałbrzych62.3% tree cover
Worst air right now
Dąbrowa GórniczaAQI 130

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 71 in Germany and 39 in Poland, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Germany rests on 71 cities against 39, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Germany vs Poland: your questions answered

Is Germany cleaner than Poland?

On air quality, yes, right now: Germany's cities average AQI 49 against 73 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Germany 49 (70 cities) and Poland 79 (31 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Germany or Poland?

Poland has lost more: about 1.52 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.49 million ha in Germany. 35,100 ha of Poland's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Germany or Poland?

Germany does: its measured cities average 38.4% tree cover against 37.6%, a gap of 0.8 percentage points.

How many cities are the Germany and Poland figures based on?

71 measured cities in Germany and 39 in Poland. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Germany and Poland?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Germany

More comparisons for Poland

Build your own

Compare Germany with somewhere else

This place

Germany