Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 72 cities measured

Myanmar vs Poland Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Myanmar has cleaner air than Poland right now: its cities average AQI 19 against 73.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Myanmar 14 (3 cities) and Poland 79 (31 cities). Myanmar has lost more forest since 2001. Myanmar has more tree cover in its cities.

Myanmar

Average of 33 cities

AQI 19

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 14
Tree cover
44.4%
Forest lost since 2001
5.35 million ha
Poland

Average of 39 cities

AQI 73

Moderate

At ground stations
AQI 79
Tree cover
37.6%
Forest lost since 2001
1.52 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Myanmar vs Poland at a glance

Myanmar is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Poland on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Myanmar and Poland compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
MyanmarPoland
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.19 (better)73
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.14 (better)79
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.0% (better)13%
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.5.35 million ha1.52 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.13% (better)15%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.44.4% (better)37.6%

Air quality today

Is Myanmar cleaner than Poland?

On air quality, yes, right now. Myanmar has cleaner air than Poland right now: its cities average AQI 19 against 73.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Myanmar 14 (3 cities) and Poland 79 (31 cities).

0% of the measured cities in Myanmar are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 13% in Poland.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Myanmar

  • Good30 (91%)
  • Moderate3 (9%)

Poland

  • Good7 (18%)
  • Moderate27 (69%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups5 (13%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Myanmar and Poland compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Myanmar average cleaner air than 99% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Poland than 21%.

Cleaner air than…

Myanmar
Beats 99%
Poland
Beats 21%

More tree cover than…

Myanmar
Beats 95%
Poland
Beats 82%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Myanmar or Poland?

Myanmar has lost more: about 5.35 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.52 million ha in Poland, or 3.5 times as much. 2 million ha of Myanmar's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Myanmar
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 363,000 ha lost.

Poland
20012025

Worst year: 2018, with 96,800 ha lost.

Forest loss in Myanmar and Poland, 2001 to 2025
MyanmarPoland
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.5.35 million ha1.52 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.13% (better)15%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.2 million ha35,100 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeShifting farming (61%)Logging (97%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Myanmar or Poland?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 37.6%, a gap of 6.8 percentage points.

Myanmar44.4%
Poland37.6%
Tree figures for Myanmar and Poland
MyanmarPoland
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.4.2M4.5M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.15% (better)26%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.133K85.0K (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Myanmar and Poland

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Myanmar

Greenest measured city
Thandwe66.3% tree cover
Worst air right now
MingaladonAQI 14

Poland

Greenest measured city
Wałbrzych62.3% tree cover
Worst air right now
Dąbrowa GórniczaAQI 130

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 33 in Myanmar and 39 in Poland, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Poland rests on 39 cities against 33, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Myanmar vs Poland: your questions answered

Is Myanmar cleaner than Poland?

On air quality, yes, right now: Myanmar's cities average AQI 19 against 73 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Myanmar 14 (3 cities) and Poland 79 (31 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Myanmar or Poland?

Myanmar has lost more: about 5.35 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.52 million ha in Poland, or 3.5 times as much. 2 million ha of Myanmar's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Myanmar or Poland?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 37.6%, a gap of 6.8 percentage points.

How many cities are the Myanmar and Poland figures based on?

33 measured cities in Myanmar and 39 in Poland. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Myanmar and Poland?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Myanmar

More comparisons for Poland

Build your own

Compare Myanmar with somewhere else

This place

Myanmar