Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 132 cities measured

Myanmar vs Nigeria Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Myanmar has cleaner air than Nigeria right now: its cities average AQI 19 against 101.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Myanmar 14 (3 cities) and Nigeria 81 (13 cities). Myanmar has lost more forest since 2001. Myanmar has more tree cover in its cities.

Myanmar

Average of 33 cities

AQI 19

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 14
Tree cover
44.4%
Forest lost since 2001
5.35 million ha
Nigeria

Average of 99 cities

AQI 101

Unhealthy for sensitive groups

At ground stations
AQI 81
Tree cover
19.4%
Forest lost since 2001
1.56 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Myanmar vs Nigeria at a glance

Myanmar is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Nigeria on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Myanmar and Nigeria compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
MyanmarNigeria
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.19 (better)101
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.14 (better)81
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.0% (better)39%
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.5.35 million ha1.56 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.13% (better)16%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.44.4% (better)19.4%

Air quality today

Is Myanmar cleaner than Nigeria?

On air quality, yes, right now. Myanmar has cleaner air than Nigeria right now: its cities average AQI 19 against 101.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Myanmar 14 (3 cities) and Nigeria 81 (13 cities).

0% of the measured cities in Myanmar are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 39% in Nigeria.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Myanmar

  • Good30 (91%)
  • Moderate3 (9%)

Nigeria

  • Good2 (2%)
  • Moderate58 (59%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups29 (29%)
  • Unhealthy9 (9%)
  • Very unhealthy1 (1%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Myanmar and Nigeria compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Myanmar average cleaner air than 99% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Nigeria than 6%.

Cleaner air than…

Myanmar
Beats 99%
Nigeria
Beats 6%

More tree cover than…

Myanmar
Beats 95%
Nigeria
Beats 39%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Myanmar or Nigeria?

Myanmar has lost more: about 5.35 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.56 million ha in Nigeria, or 3.4 times as much. 2 million ha of Myanmar's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Myanmar
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 363,000 ha lost.

Nigeria
20012025

Worst year: 2017, with 172,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Myanmar and Nigeria, 2001 to 2025
MyanmarNigeria
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.5.35 million ha1.56 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.13% (better)16%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.2 million ha1.44 million ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeShifting farming (61%)Farms, pasture and plantations (87%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Myanmar or Nigeria?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 19.4%, a gap of 25.0 percentage points.

Myanmar44.4%
Nigeria19.4%
Tree figures for Myanmar and Nigeria
MyanmarNigeria
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.4.2M5.8M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.15% (better)83%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.133K (better)5.3M

Behind the averages

The cities behind Myanmar and Nigeria

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Myanmar

Greenest measured city
Thandwe66.3% tree cover
Worst air right now
MingaladonAQI 14

Nigeria

Greenest measured city
Efon-Alaaye76.1% tree cover
Worst air right now
NsukkaAQI 151

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 33 in Myanmar and 99 in Nigeria, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Nigeria rests on 99 cities against 33, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Myanmar vs Nigeria: your questions answered

Is Myanmar cleaner than Nigeria?

On air quality, yes, right now: Myanmar's cities average AQI 19 against 101 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Myanmar 14 (3 cities) and Nigeria 81 (13 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Myanmar or Nigeria?

Myanmar has lost more: about 5.35 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.56 million ha in Nigeria, or 3.4 times as much. 2 million ha of Myanmar's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Myanmar or Nigeria?

Myanmar does: its measured cities average 44.4% tree cover against 19.4%, a gap of 25.0 percentage points.

How many cities are the Myanmar and Nigeria figures based on?

33 measured cities in Myanmar and 99 in Nigeria. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Myanmar and Nigeria?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Myanmar

More comparisons for Nigeria

Build your own

Compare Myanmar with somewhere else

This place

Myanmar