Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 130 cities measured

Nigeria vs Thailand Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Thailand has cleaner air than Nigeria right now: its cities average AQI 62 against 101.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Nigeria 81 (13 cities) and Thailand 67 (28 cities). Thailand has lost more forest since 2001. Thailand has more tree cover in its cities.

Nigeria

Average of 99 cities

AQI 101

Unhealthy for sensitive groups

At ground stations
AQI 81
Tree cover
19.4%
Forest lost since 2001
1.56 million ha
Thailand

Average of 31 cities

AQI 62

Moderate

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 67
Tree cover
32.7%
Forest lost since 2001
2.84 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Nigeria vs Thailand at a glance

Thailand is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Nigeria on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Nigeria and Thailand compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
NigeriaThailand
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.10162 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.8167 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.39%0% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.1.56 million ha (better)2.84 million ha
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.16%14% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.19.4%32.7% (better)

Air quality today

Is Thailand cleaner than Nigeria?

On air quality, yes, right now. Thailand has cleaner air than Nigeria right now: its cities average AQI 62 against 101.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Nigeria 81 (13 cities) and Thailand 67 (28 cities).

39% of the measured cities in Nigeria are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Thailand.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Nigeria

  • Good2 (2%)
  • Moderate58 (59%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups29 (29%)
  • Unhealthy9 (9%)
  • Very unhealthy1 (1%)

Thailand

  • Good5 (16%)
  • Moderate26 (84%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Nigeria and Thailand compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Nigeria average cleaner air than 6% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Thailand than 34%.

Cleaner air than…

Nigeria
Beats 6%
Thailand
Beats 34%

More tree cover than…

Nigeria
Beats 39%
Thailand
Beats 73%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Nigeria or Thailand?

Thailand has lost more: about 2.84 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.56 million ha in Nigeria, or 1.8 times as much. 2.49 million ha of Thailand's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Nigeria
20012025

Worst year: 2017, with 172,000 ha lost.

Thailand
20012025

Worst year: 2017, with 199,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Nigeria and Thailand, 2001 to 2025
NigeriaThailand
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.1.56 million ha (better)2.84 million ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.16%14% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.1.44 million ha (better)2.49 million ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (87%)Farms, pasture and plantations (86%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Nigeria or Thailand?

Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 19.4%, a gap of 13.3 percentage points.

Nigeria19.4%
Thailand32.7%
Tree figures for Nigeria and Thailand
NigeriaThailand
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.5.8M (better)3.0M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.83%42% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.5.3M286K (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Nigeria and Thailand

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Nigeria

Greenest measured city
Efon-Alaaye76.1% tree cover
Worst air right now
NsukkaAQI 151

Thailand

Greenest measured city
Kabin Buri64.4% tree cover
Worst air right now
Chon BuriAQI 85

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 99 in Nigeria and 31 in Thailand, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Nigeria rests on 99 cities against 31, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Nigeria vs Thailand: your questions answered

Is Thailand cleaner than Nigeria?

On air quality, yes, right now: Thailand's cities average AQI 62 against 101 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Nigeria 81 (13 cities) and Thailand 67 (28 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Nigeria or Thailand?

Thailand has lost more: about 2.84 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.56 million ha in Nigeria, or 1.8 times as much. 2.49 million ha of Thailand's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Nigeria or Thailand?

Thailand does: its measured cities average 32.7% tree cover against 19.4%, a gap of 13.3 percentage points.

How many cities are the Nigeria and Thailand figures based on?

99 measured cities in Nigeria and 31 in Thailand. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Nigeria and Thailand?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Nigeria

More comparisons for Thailand

Build your own

Compare Nigeria with somewhere else

This place

Nigeria