Country comparison · 104 cities measured
Egypt vs Poland Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Poland has cleaner air than Egypt right now: its cities average AQI 73 against 171.
Poland has lost more forest since 2001. Poland has more tree cover in its cities.
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Egypt171Poland73
Head to head
Egypt vs Poland at a glance
Poland is ahead on 3 of 5 measures, and Egypt on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Egypt | Poland | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 171 | 73 (better) |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 52% | 13% (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 1,580 ha (better) | 1.52 million ha |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 1.2% (better) | 15% |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 12.7% | 37.6% (better) |
Air quality today
Is Poland cleaner than Egypt?
On air quality, yes, right now. Poland has cleaner air than Egypt right now: its cities average AQI 73 against 171.
52% of the measured cities in Egypt are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 13% in Poland.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Egypt
- Good2 (3%)
- Moderate29 (45%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups11 (17%)
- Unhealthy12 (18%)
- Very unhealthy5 (8%)
- Hazardous6 (9%)
Poland
- Good7 (18%)
- Moderate27 (69%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups5 (13%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Egypt and Poland compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of Egypt average cleaner air than 1% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Poland than 21%.
Cleaner air than…
- Egypt
- Beats 1%
- Poland
- Beats 21%
More tree cover than…
- Egypt
- Beats 24%
- Poland
- Beats 82%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Egypt or Poland?
Poland has lost more: about 1.52 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1,580 ha in Egypt, or 966 times as much. 35,100 ha of Poland's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2012, with 337 ha lost.
Worst year: 2018, with 96,800 ha lost.
| Egypt | Poland | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 1,580 ha (better) | 1.52 million ha |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 1.2% (better) | 15% |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 1,030 ha (better) | 35,100 ha |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Too little to call | Holding steady |
| Main known cause | Farms, pasture and plantations (55%) | Logging (97%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Egypt or Poland?
Poland does: its measured cities average 37.6% tree cover against 12.7%, a gap of 24.9 percentage points.
| Egypt | Poland | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 2.5M | 4.5M (better) |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 95% | 26% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 4.7M | 85.0K (better) |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Egypt and Poland
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Poland
- Greenest measured city
- Wałbrzych62.3% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- Dąbrowa GórniczaAQI 130
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 65 in Egypt and 39 in Poland, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Egypt rests on 65 cities against 39, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Egypt vs Poland: your questions answered
Is Poland cleaner than Egypt?
On air quality, yes, right now: Poland's cities average AQI 73 against 171 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather.
Which country has lost more forest, Egypt or Poland?
Poland has lost more: about 1.52 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1,580 ha in Egypt, or 966 times as much. 35,100 ha of Poland's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Egypt or Poland?
Poland does: its measured cities average 37.6% tree cover against 12.7%, a gap of 24.9 percentage points.
How many cities are the Egypt and Poland figures based on?
65 measured cities in Egypt and 39 in Poland. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Does this cover the whole of Egypt and Poland?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Egypt
More comparisons for Poland
Build your own
Compare Egypt with somewhere else
This place
Egypt