Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 753 cities measured

China vs Vietnam Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Vietnam has cleaner air than China right now: its cities average AQI 53 against 114.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 125 (433 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities). China has lost more forest since 2001. Vietnam has more tree cover in its cities.

China

Average of 639 cities

AQI 114

Unhealthy for sensitive groups

At ground stations
AQI 125
Tree cover
22.9%
Forest lost since 2001
13.5 million ha
Vietnam

Average of 114 cities

AQI 53

Moderate

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 77
Tree cover
35.8%
Forest lost since 2001
3.85 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

China vs Vietnam at a glance

Vietnam is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and China on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

China and Vietnam compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
ChinaVietnam
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.11453 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.12577 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.55%9% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.13.5 million ha3.85 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.8.3% (better)23%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.22.9%35.8% (better)

Air quality today

Is Vietnam cleaner than China?

On air quality, yes, right now. Vietnam has cleaner air than China right now: its cities average AQI 53 against 114.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 125 (433 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities).

55% of the measured cities in China are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 9% in Vietnam.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

China

  • Good47 (7%)
  • Moderate241 (38%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups141 (22%)
  • Unhealthy190 (30%)
  • Very unhealthy20 (3%)

Vietnam

  • Good43 (38%)
  • Moderate61 (54%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups7 (6%)
  • Unhealthy3 (3%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do China and Vietnam compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of China average cleaner air than 4% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Vietnam than 48%.

Cleaner air than…

China
Beats 4%
Vietnam
Beats 48%

More tree cover than…

China
Beats 46%
Vietnam
Beats 79%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, China or Vietnam?

China has lost more: about 13.5 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 3.85 million ha in Vietnam, or 3.5 times as much. 2.24 million ha of China's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

China
20012025

Worst year: 2008, with 739,000 ha lost.

Vietnam
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 357,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in China and Vietnam, 2001 to 2025
ChinaVietnam
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.13.5 million ha3.85 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.8.3% (better)23%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.2.24 million ha1.41 million ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadySlowing down
Main known causeLogging (75%)Logging (47%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, China or Vietnam?

Vietnam does: its measured cities average 35.8% tree cover against 22.9%, a gap of 12.9 percentage points.

China22.9%
Vietnam35.8%
Tree figures for China and Vietnam
ChinaVietnam
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.43.8M (better)12.0M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.81%44% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.27.4M1.4M (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind China and Vietnam

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

China

Greenest measured city
Fenghuang80.9% tree cover
Worst air right now
FuxinAQI 243

Vietnam

Greenest measured city
Thị Trấn Thuận Châu82.6% tree cover
Worst air right now
Phúc YênAQI 152

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 639 in China and 114 in Vietnam, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. China rests on 639 cities against 114, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

China vs Vietnam: your questions answered

Is Vietnam cleaner than China?

On air quality, yes, right now: Vietnam's cities average AQI 53 against 114 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 125 (433 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, China or Vietnam?

China has lost more: about 13.5 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 3.85 million ha in Vietnam, or 3.5 times as much. 2.24 million ha of China's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, China or Vietnam?

Vietnam does: its measured cities average 35.8% tree cover against 22.9%, a gap of 12.9 percentage points.

How many cities are the China and Vietnam figures based on?

639 measured cities in China and 114 in Vietnam. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of China and Vietnam?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for China

More comparisons for Vietnam

Build your own

Compare China with somewhere else

This place

China