Country comparison · 206 cities measured
United Kingdom vs Vietnam Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
United Kingdom has cleaner air than Vietnam right now: its cities average AQI 35 against 53.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are United Kingdom 32 (81 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities). Vietnam has lost more forest since 2001. Vietnam has more tree cover in its cities.
Average of 92 cities
AQI 35
Good
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 32
- Tree cover
- 26.6%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 607,000 ha
Average of 114 cities
AQI 53
Moderate
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 77
- Tree cover
- 35.8%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 3.85 million ha
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
United Kingdom35Vietnam53
Head to head
United Kingdom vs Vietnam at a glance
United Kingdom is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Vietnam on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.
| United Kingdom | Vietnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 35 (better) | 53 |
| At ground stationsCities with a current station reading. | 32 (better) | 77 |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 0% (better) | 9% |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 607,000 ha (better) | 3.85 million ha |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 17% (better) | 23% |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 26.6% | 35.8% (better) |
Air quality today
Is United Kingdom cleaner than Vietnam?
On air quality, yes, right now. United Kingdom has cleaner air than Vietnam right now: its cities average AQI 35 against 53.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are United Kingdom 32 (81 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities).
0% of the measured cities in the United Kingdom are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 9% in Vietnam.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
United Kingdom
- Good66 (72%)
- Moderate26 (28%)
Vietnam
- Good43 (38%)
- Moderate61 (54%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups7 (6%)
- Unhealthy3 (3%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do United Kingdom and Vietnam compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of the United Kingdom average cleaner air than 80% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Vietnam than 48%.
Cleaner air than…
- United Kingdom
- Beats 80%
- Vietnam
- Beats 48%
More tree cover than…
- United Kingdom
- Beats 58%
- Vietnam
- Beats 79%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, United Kingdom or Vietnam?
Vietnam has lost more: about 3.85 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 607,000 ha in the United Kingdom, or 6.3 times as much. 1.41 million ha of Vietnam's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2009, with 37,400 ha lost.
Worst year: 2016, with 357,000 ha lost.
| United Kingdom | Vietnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 607,000 ha (better) | 3.85 million ha |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 17% (better) | 23% |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 15,700 ha (better) | 1.41 million ha |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Holding steady | Slowing down |
| Main known cause | Logging (93%) | Logging (47%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, United Kingdom or Vietnam?
Vietnam does: its measured cities average 35.8% tree cover against 26.6%, a gap of 9.2 percentage points.
| United Kingdom | Vietnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 7.4M | 12.0M (better) |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 68% | 44% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 1.5M | 1.4M (better) |
Behind the averages
The cities behind United Kingdom and Vietnam
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Vietnam
- Greenest measured city
- Thị Trấn Thuận Châu82.6% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- Phúc YênAQI 152
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 92 in the United Kingdom and 114 in Vietnam, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Vietnam rests on 114 cities against 92, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
United Kingdom vs Vietnam: your questions answered
Is United Kingdom cleaner than Vietnam?
On air quality, yes, right now: United Kingdom's cities average AQI 35 against 53 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are United Kingdom 32 (81 cities) and Vietnam 77 (20 cities).
Which country has lost more forest, United Kingdom or Vietnam?
Vietnam has lost more: about 3.85 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 607,000 ha in the United Kingdom, or 6.3 times as much. 1.41 million ha of Vietnam's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, United Kingdom or Vietnam?
Vietnam does: its measured cities average 35.8% tree cover against 26.6%, a gap of 9.2 percentage points.
How many cities are the United Kingdom and Vietnam figures based on?
92 measured cities in the United Kingdom and 114 in Vietnam. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Why are there two air quality averages for each country?
The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.
Does this cover the whole of the United Kingdom and Vietnam?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for United Kingdom
More comparisons for Vietnam
Build your own
Compare United Kingdom with somewhere else
This place
United Kingdom