Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 846 cities measured

China vs Japan Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Japan has cleaner air than China right now: its cities average AQI 47 against 114.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 125 (433 cities) and Japan 48 (193 cities). China has lost more forest since 2001. China has more tree cover in its cities.

China

Average of 639 cities

AQI 114

Unhealthy for sensitive groups

At ground stations
AQI 125
Tree cover
22.9%
Forest lost since 2001
13.5 million ha
Japan

Average of 207 cities

AQI 47

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 48
Tree cover
16.4%
Forest lost since 2001
1.02 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

China vs Japan at a glance

Japan is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and China on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

China and Japan compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
ChinaJapan
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.11447 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.12548 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.55%0% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.13.5 million ha1.02 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.8.3%3.9% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.22.9% (better)16.4%

Air quality today

Is Japan cleaner than China?

On air quality, yes, right now. Japan has cleaner air than China right now: its cities average AQI 47 against 114.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 125 (433 cities) and Japan 48 (193 cities).

55% of the measured cities in China are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Japan.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

China

  • Good47 (7%)
  • Moderate241 (38%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups141 (22%)
  • Unhealthy190 (30%)
  • Very unhealthy20 (3%)

Japan

  • Good102 (49%)
  • Moderate105 (51%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do China and Japan compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of China average cleaner air than 4% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Japan than 58%.

Cleaner air than…

China
Beats 4%
Japan
Beats 58%

More tree cover than…

China
Beats 46%
Japan
Beats 33%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, China or Japan?

China has lost more: about 13.5 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 13 times as much. 2.24 million ha of China's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

China
20012025

Worst year: 2008, with 739,000 ha lost.

Japan
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 54,800 ha lost.

Forest loss in China and Japan, 2001 to 2025
ChinaJapan
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.13.5 million ha1.02 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.8.3%3.9% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.2.24 million ha108,000 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeLogging (75%)Logging (87%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, China or Japan?

China does: its measured cities average 22.9% tree cover against 16.4%, a gap of 6.5 percentage points.

China22.9%
Japan16.4%
Tree figures for China and Japan
ChinaJapan
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.43.8M (better)10.2M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.81% (better)82%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.27.4M9.6M (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind China and Japan

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

China

Greenest measured city
Fenghuang80.9% tree cover
Worst air right now
FuxinAQI 243

Japan

Greenest measured city
Ōme74.7% tree cover
Worst air right now
SagaAQI 94

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 639 in China and 207 in Japan, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. China rests on 639 cities against 207, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

China vs Japan: your questions answered

Is Japan cleaner than China?

On air quality, yes, right now: Japan's cities average AQI 47 against 114 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are China 125 (433 cities) and Japan 48 (193 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, China or Japan?

China has lost more: about 13.5 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 13 times as much. 2.24 million ha of China's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, China or Japan?

China does: its measured cities average 22.9% tree cover against 16.4%, a gap of 6.5 percentage points.

How many cities are the China and Japan figures based on?

639 measured cities in China and 207 in Japan. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of China and Japan?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for China

More comparisons for Japan

Build your own

Compare China with somewhere else

This place

China