Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 321 cities measured

Japan vs Mexico Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Japan has cleaner air than Mexico right now: its cities average AQI 47 against 69.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Japan 48 (193 cities) and Mexico 91 (46 cities). Mexico has lost more forest since 2001. Japan has more tree cover in its cities.

Japan

Average of 207 cities

AQI 47

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 48
Tree cover
16.4%
Forest lost since 2001
1.02 million ha
Mexico

Average of 114 cities

AQI 69

Moderate

At ground stations
AQI 91
Tree cover
14.6%
Forest lost since 2001
5.46 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Japan vs Mexico at a glance

Japan is ahead on 6 of 6 measures, and Mexico on 0. The better figure in each row is marked.

Japan and Mexico compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
JapanMexico
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.47 (better)69
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.48 (better)91
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.0% (better)22%
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.1.02 million ha (better)5.46 million ha
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.3.9% (better)10%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.16.4% (better)14.6%

Air quality today

Is Japan cleaner than Mexico?

On air quality, yes, right now. Japan has cleaner air than Mexico right now: its cities average AQI 47 against 69.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Japan 48 (193 cities) and Mexico 91 (46 cities).

0% of the measured cities in Japan are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 22% in Mexico.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Japan

  • Good102 (49%)
  • Moderate105 (51%)

Mexico

  • Good38 (33%)
  • Moderate51 (45%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups24 (21%)
  • Unhealthy1 (1%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Japan and Mexico compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Japan average cleaner air than 58% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Mexico than 25%.

Cleaner air than…

Japan
Beats 58%
Mexico
Beats 25%

More tree cover than…

Japan
Beats 33%
Mexico
Beats 29%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Japan or Mexico?

Mexico has lost more: about 5.46 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 5.4 times as much. 4.39 million ha of Mexico's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Japan
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 54,800 ha lost.

Mexico
20012025

Worst year: 2024, with 332,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Japan and Mexico, 2001 to 2025
JapanMexico
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.1.02 million ha (better)5.46 million ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.3.9% (better)10%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.108,000 ha (better)4.39 million ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeLogging (87%)Farms, pasture and plantations (79%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Japan or Mexico?

Japan does: its measured cities average 16.4% tree cover against 14.6%, a gap of 1.8 percentage points.

Japan16.4%
Mexico14.6%
Tree figures for Japan and Mexico
JapanMexico
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.10.2M (better)5.1M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.82% (better)94%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.9.6M6.1M (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Japan and Mexico

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Japan

Greenest measured city
Ōme74.7% tree cover
Worst air right now
SagaAQI 94

Mexico

Greenest measured city
Teziutlan52.6% tree cover
Worst air right now
TuxtlaAQI 146

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 207 in Japan and 114 in Mexico, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Japan rests on 207 cities against 114, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Japan vs Mexico: your questions answered

Is Japan cleaner than Mexico?

On air quality, yes, right now: Japan's cities average AQI 47 against 69 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Japan 48 (193 cities) and Mexico 91 (46 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Japan or Mexico?

Mexico has lost more: about 5.46 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.02 million ha in Japan, or 5.4 times as much. 4.39 million ha of Mexico's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Japan or Mexico?

Japan does: its measured cities average 16.4% tree cover against 14.6%, a gap of 1.8 percentage points.

How many cities are the Japan and Mexico figures based on?

207 measured cities in Japan and 114 in Mexico. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Japan and Mexico?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Japan

More comparisons for Mexico

Build your own

Compare Japan with somewhere else

This place

Japan