Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 341 cities measured

Argentina vs Brazil Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Argentina and Brazil are level right now: both average AQI 37 across their measured cities.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Brazil 46 (60 cities). Brazil has lost more forest since 2001. Brazil has more tree cover in its cities.

Argentina

Average of 37 cities

AQI 37

Good

At ground stations
AQI 62
Tree cover
18.2%
Forest lost since 2001
7.18 million ha
Brazil

Average of 304 cities

AQI 37

Good

At ground stations
AQI 46
Tree cover
26.2%
Forest lost since 2001
76.6 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Argentina vs Brazil at a glance

Brazil is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Argentina on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Argentina and Brazil compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
ArgentinaBrazil
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.3737
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.6246 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.3%1% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.7.18 million ha (better)76.6 million ha
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.18%15% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.18.2%26.2% (better)

Air quality today

Is Argentina cleaner than Brazil?

On air quality they are level right now. Argentina and Brazil are level right now: both average AQI 37 across their measured cities.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Brazil 46 (60 cities).

3% of the measured cities in Argentina are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 1% in Brazil.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Argentina

  • Good30 (81%)
  • Moderate6 (16%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups1 (3%)

Brazil

  • Good207 (68%)
  • Moderate93 (31%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups3 (1%)
  • Unhealthy1 (0%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Argentina and Brazil compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Argentina average cleaner air than 75% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Brazil than 75%.

Cleaner air than…

Argentina
Beats 75%
Brazil
Beats 75%

More tree cover than…

Argentina
Beats 37%
Brazil
Beats 55%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Brazil?

Brazil has lost more: about 76.6 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 7.18 million ha in Argentina, or 11 times as much. 56.2 million ha of Brazil's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Argentina
20012025

Worst year: 2008, with 594,000 ha lost.

Brazil
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 5.41 million ha lost.

Forest loss in Argentina and Brazil, 2001 to 2025
ArgentinaBrazil
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.7.18 million ha (better)76.6 million ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.18%15% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.5.72 million ha (better)56.2 million ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (79%)Farms, pasture and plantations (73%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Brazil?

Brazil does: its measured cities average 26.2% tree cover against 18.2%, a gap of 8.0 percentage points.

Argentina18.2%
Brazil26.2%
Tree figures for Argentina and Brazil
ArgentinaBrazil
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.2.0M23.7M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.89%68% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.1.5M (better)7.4M

Behind the averages

The cities behind Argentina and Brazil

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Argentina

Greenest measured city
Ituzaingó63.5% tree cover
Worst air right now
San Salvador de JujuyAQI 86

Brazil

Greenest measured city
Petrópolis73.8% tree cover
Worst air right now
Duque de CaxiasAQI 185

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 37 in Argentina and 304 in Brazil, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Brazil rests on 304 cities against 37, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Argentina vs Brazil: your questions answered

Is Argentina cleaner than Brazil?

On air quality they are level right now: both average AQI 37 across their measured cities. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Brazil 46 (60 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Brazil?

Brazil has lost more: about 76.6 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 7.18 million ha in Argentina, or 11 times as much. 56.2 million ha of Brazil's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Brazil?

Brazil does: its measured cities average 26.2% tree cover against 18.2%, a gap of 8.0 percentage points.

How many cities are the Argentina and Brazil figures based on?

37 measured cities in Argentina and 304 in Brazil. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Argentina and Brazil?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Argentina

More comparisons for Brazil

Build your own

Compare Argentina with somewhere else

This place

Argentina