Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 361 cities measured

Brazil vs Spain Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Spain has cleaner air than Brazil right now: its cities average AQI 21 against 37.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Brazil 46 (60 cities) and Spain 24 (30 cities). Brazil has lost more forest since 2001. Brazil has more tree cover in its cities.

Brazil

Average of 304 cities

AQI 37

Good

At ground stations
AQI 46
Tree cover
26.2%
Forest lost since 2001
76.6 million ha
Spain

Average of 57 cities

AQI 21

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 24
Tree cover
14.3%
Forest lost since 2001
1.79 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Brazil vs Spain at a glance

Spain is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Brazil on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Brazil and Spain compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
BrazilSpain
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.3721 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.4624 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.1%0% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.76.6 million ha1.79 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.15% (better)17%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.26.2% (better)14.3%

Air quality today

Is Spain cleaner than Brazil?

On air quality, yes, right now. Spain has cleaner air than Brazil right now: its cities average AQI 21 against 37.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Brazil 46 (60 cities) and Spain 24 (30 cities).

1% of the measured cities in Brazil are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Spain.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Brazil

  • Good207 (68%)
  • Moderate93 (31%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups3 (1%)
  • Unhealthy1 (0%)

Spain

  • Good56 (98%)
  • Moderate1 (2%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Brazil and Spain compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Brazil average cleaner air than 75% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Spain than 98%.

Cleaner air than…

Brazil
Beats 75%
Spain
Beats 98%

More tree cover than…

Brazil
Beats 55%
Spain
Beats 28%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Brazil or Spain?

Brazil has lost more: about 76.6 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.79 million ha in Spain, or 43 times as much. 56.2 million ha of Brazil's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Brazil
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 5.41 million ha lost.

Spain
20012025

Worst year: 2025, with 153,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Brazil and Spain, 2001 to 2025
BrazilSpain
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.76.6 million ha1.79 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.15% (better)17%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.56.2 million ha81,100 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (73%)Logging (65%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Brazil or Spain?

Brazil does: its measured cities average 26.2% tree cover against 14.3%, a gap of 11.9 percentage points.

Brazil26.2%
Spain14.3%
Tree figures for Brazil and Spain
BrazilSpain
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.23.7M (better)2.4M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.68% (better)91%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.7.4M2.6M (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Brazil and Spain

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Brazil

Greenest measured city
Petrópolis73.8% tree cover
Worst air right now
Duque de CaxiasAQI 185

Spain

Greenest measured city
Girona44.1% tree cover
Worst air right now
ParlaAQI 64

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 304 in Brazil and 57 in Spain, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Brazil rests on 304 cities against 57, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Brazil vs Spain: your questions answered

Is Spain cleaner than Brazil?

On air quality, yes, right now: Spain's cities average AQI 21 against 37 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Brazil 46 (60 cities) and Spain 24 (30 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Brazil or Spain?

Brazil has lost more: about 76.6 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.79 million ha in Spain, or 43 times as much. 56.2 million ha of Brazil's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Brazil or Spain?

Brazil does: its measured cities average 26.2% tree cover against 14.3%, a gap of 11.9 percentage points.

How many cities are the Brazil and Spain figures based on?

304 measured cities in Brazil and 57 in Spain. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Brazil and Spain?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Brazil

More comparisons for Spain

Build your own

Compare Brazil with somewhere else

This place

Brazil