Country comparison · 157 cities measured
Philippines vs Spain Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Spain has cleaner air than Philippines right now: its cities average AQI 29 against 45.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Philippines 72 (25 cities) and Spain 29 (30 cities). Spain has lost more forest since 2001. Philippines has more tree cover in its cities.
Average of 100 cities
AQI 45
Good
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 72
- Tree cover
- 40.9%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 1.53 million ha
Average of 57 cities
AQI 29
Good
Cleaner on average
- At ground stations
- AQI 29
- Tree cover
- 14.3%
- Forest lost since 2001
- 1.79 million ha
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Philippines45Spain29
Head to head
Philippines vs Spain at a glance
Philippines and Spain are level, each ahead on 3 of 6 measures. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Philippines | Spain | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 45 | 29 (better) |
| At ground stationsCities with a current station reading. | 72 | 29 (better) |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 9% | 0% (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 1.53 million ha (better) | 1.79 million ha |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 8.4% (better) | 17% |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 40.9% (better) | 14.3% |
Air quality today
Is Spain cleaner than Philippines?
On air quality, yes, right now. Spain has cleaner air than Philippines right now: its cities average AQI 29 against 45.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Philippines 72 (25 cities) and Spain 29 (30 cities).
9% of the measured cities in the Philippines are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Spain.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Philippines
- Good63 (63%)
- Moderate28 (28%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups8 (8%)
- Unhealthy1 (1%)
Spain
- Good56 (98%)
- Moderate1 (2%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Philippines and Spain compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of the Philippines average cleaner air than 62% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Spain than 89%.
Cleaner air than…
- Philippines
- Beats 62%
- Spain
- Beats 89%
More tree cover than…
- Philippines
- Beats 90%
- Spain
- Beats 28%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Philippines or Spain?
Spain has lost more: about 1.79 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.53 million ha in the Philippines. 81,100 ha of Spain's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2016, with 126,000 ha lost.
Worst year: 2025, with 153,000 ha lost.
| Philippines | Spain | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 1.53 million ha (better) | 1.79 million ha |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 8.4% (better) | 17% |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 939,000 ha | 81,100 ha (better) |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Slowing down | Holding steady |
| Main known cause | Farms, pasture and plantations (60%) | Logging (65%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Philippines or Spain?
Philippines does: its measured cities average 40.9% tree cover against 14.3%, a gap of 26.6 percentage points.
| Philippines | Spain | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 11.3M (better) | 2.4M |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 22% (better) | 91% |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 542K (better) | 2.6M |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Philippines and Spain
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Philippines
- Greenest measured city
- Catbalogan74.4% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- PandiAQI 120
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 100 in the Philippines and 57 in Spain, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Philippines rests on 100 cities against 57, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Philippines vs Spain: your questions answered
Is Spain cleaner than Philippines?
On air quality, yes, right now: Spain's cities average AQI 29 against 45 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Philippines 72 (25 cities) and Spain 29 (30 cities).
Which country has lost more forest, Philippines or Spain?
Spain has lost more: about 1.79 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.53 million ha in the Philippines. 81,100 ha of Spain's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Philippines or Spain?
Philippines does: its measured cities average 40.9% tree cover against 14.3%, a gap of 26.6 percentage points.
How many cities are the Philippines and Spain figures based on?
100 measured cities in the Philippines and 57 in Spain. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Why are there two air quality averages for each country?
The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.
Does this cover the whole of the Philippines and Spain?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Philippines
More comparisons for Spain
Build your own
Compare Philippines with somewhere else
This place
Philippines