Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 81 cities measured

Argentina vs Italy Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Argentina has cleaner air than Italy right now: its cities average AQI 37 against 46.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Italy 39 (17 cities), which puts Italy ahead instead. Argentina has lost more forest since 2001. Italy has more tree cover in its cities.

Argentina

Average of 37 cities

AQI 37

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 62
Tree cover
18.2%
Forest lost since 2001
7.18 million ha
Italy

Average of 44 cities

AQI 46

Good

At ground stations
AQI 39
Tree cover
23.6%
Forest lost since 2001
547,000 ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Argentina vs Italy at a glance

Italy is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Argentina on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Argentina and Italy compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
ArgentinaItaly
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.37 (better)46
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.6239 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.3%2% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.7.18 million ha547,000 ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.18%5.9% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.18.2%23.6% (better)

Air quality today

Is Argentina cleaner than Italy?

On air quality, yes, right now. Argentina has cleaner air than Italy right now: its cities average AQI 37 against 46.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Italy 39 (17 cities), which puts Italy ahead instead.

3% of the measured cities in Argentina are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 2% in Italy.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Argentina

  • Good30 (81%)
  • Moderate6 (16%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups1 (3%)

Italy

  • Good23 (52%)
  • Moderate20 (45%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups1 (2%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Argentina and Italy compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Argentina average cleaner air than 75% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Italy than 59%.

Cleaner air than…

Argentina
Beats 75%
Italy
Beats 59%

More tree cover than…

Argentina
Beats 37%
Italy
Beats 49%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Italy?

Argentina has lost more: about 7.18 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 547,000 ha in Italy, or 13 times as much. 5.72 million ha of Argentina's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Argentina
20012025

Worst year: 2008, with 594,000 ha lost.

Italy
20012025

Worst year: 2019, with 59,300 ha lost.

Forest loss in Argentina and Italy, 2001 to 2025
ArgentinaItaly
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.7.18 million ha547,000 ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.18%5.9% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.5.72 million ha50,500 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadyHolding steady
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (79%)Logging (74%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Italy?

Italy does: its measured cities average 23.6% tree cover against 18.2%, a gap of 5.4 percentage points.

Argentina18.2%
Italy23.6%
Tree figures for Argentina and Italy
ArgentinaItaly
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.2.0M3.1M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.89%80% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.1.5M1.1M (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Argentina and Italy

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Argentina

Greenest measured city
Ituzaingó63.5% tree cover
Worst air right now
San Salvador de JujuyAQI 86

Italy

Greenest measured city
Perugia61.8% tree cover
Worst air right now
VicenzaAQI 119

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 37 in Argentina and 44 in Italy, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Italy rests on 44 cities against 37, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Argentina vs Italy: your questions answered

Is Argentina cleaner than Italy?

On air quality, yes, right now: Argentina's cities average AQI 37 against 46 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Italy 39 (17 cities), which puts Italy ahead instead.

Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Italy?

Argentina has lost more: about 7.18 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 547,000 ha in Italy, or 13 times as much. 5.72 million ha of Argentina's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Italy?

Italy does: its measured cities average 23.6% tree cover against 18.2%, a gap of 5.4 percentage points.

How many cities are the Argentina and Italy figures based on?

37 measured cities in Argentina and 44 in Italy. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Argentina and Italy?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Argentina

More comparisons for Italy

Build your own

Compare Argentina with somewhere else

This place

Argentina