Country comparison · 96 cities measured
Argentina vs Canada Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation
Canada has cleaner air than Argentina right now: its cities average AQI 25 against 37.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Canada 24 (55 cities). Canada has lost more forest since 2001. Canada has more tree cover in its cities.
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Argentina37Canada25
Head to head
Argentina vs Canada at a glance
Canada is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Argentina on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Argentina | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities. | 37 | 25 (better) |
| At ground stationsCities with a current station reading. | 62 | 24 (better) |
| Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups. | 3% | 0% (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001The whole country. | 7.18 million ha (better) | 65.6 million ha |
| Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000. | 18% | 17% (better) |
| Average tree coverAcross its measured cities. | 18.2% | 33.1% (better) |
Air quality today
Is Canada cleaner than Argentina?
On air quality, yes, right now. Canada has cleaner air than Argentina right now: its cities average AQI 25 against 37.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Canada 24 (55 cities).
3% of the measured cities in Argentina are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 0% in Canada.
How each country's cities split across the air quality bands
Argentina
- Good30 (81%)
- Moderate6 (16%)
- Unhealthy for sensitive groups1 (3%)
Canada
- Good55 (93%)
- Moderate4 (7%)
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
How do Argentina and Canada compare with other countries?
Right now the cities of Argentina average cleaner air than 75% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Canada than 94%.
Cleaner air than…
- Argentina
- Beats 75%
- Canada
- Beats 94%
More tree cover than…
- Argentina
- Beats 37%
- Canada
- Beats 74%
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Canada?
Canada has lost more: about 65.6 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 7.18 million ha in Argentina, or 9.1 times as much. 899,000 ha of Canada's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.
Worst year: 2008, with 594,000 ha lost.
Worst year: 2023, with 8.38 million ha lost.
| Argentina | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 7.18 million ha (better) | 65.6 million ha |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 18% | 17% (better) |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 5.72 million ha | 899,000 ha (better) |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Holding steady | Speeding up |
| Main known cause | Farms, pasture and plantations (79%) | Wildfires (60%) |
Trees
Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Canada?
Canada does: its measured cities average 33.1% tree cover against 18.2%, a gap of 14.9 percentage points.
| Argentina | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingSummed across measured cities. | 2.0M | 5.8M (better) |
| Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target. | 89% | 41% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach those targets. | 1.5M | 447K (better) |
Behind the averages
The cities behind Argentina and Canada
An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.
Argentina
- Greenest measured city
- Ituzaingó63.5% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- San Salvador de JujuyAQI 86
Canada
- Greenest measured city
- Saint-Louis-de-Terrebonne68.1% tree cover
- Worst air right now
- ReginaAQI 76
Reading these numbers
What a country average is, and is not
It is a mean of cities
Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 37 in Argentina and 59 in Canada, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.
Coverage shapes the number
A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Canada rests on 59 cities against 37, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
Frequently asked
Argentina vs Canada: your questions answered
Is Canada cleaner than Argentina?
On air quality, yes, right now: Canada's cities average AQI 25 against 37 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Argentina 62 (8 cities) and Canada 24 (55 cities).
Which country has lost more forest, Argentina or Canada?
Canada has lost more: about 65.6 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 7.18 million ha in Argentina, or 9.1 times as much. 899,000 ha of Canada's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.
Which country has more tree cover, Argentina or Canada?
Canada does: its measured cities average 33.1% tree cover against 18.2%, a gap of 14.9 percentage points.
How many cities are the Argentina and Canada figures based on?
37 measured cities in Argentina and 59 in Canada. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.
Why are there two air quality averages for each country?
The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.
Does this cover the whole of Argentina and Canada?
The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.
More comparisons for Argentina
More comparisons for Canada
Build your own
Compare Argentina with somewhere else
This place
Argentina