Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 90 cities measured

Canada vs Chile Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Canada has cleaner air than Chile right now: its cities average AQI 25 against 60.

Canada has lost more forest since 2001. Canada has more tree cover in its cities.

Canada

Average of 59 cities

AQI 25

Good

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 24
Tree cover
33.1%
Forest lost since 2001
65.6 million ha
Chile

Average of 31 cities

AQI 60

Moderate

Tree cover
12.9%
Forest lost since 2001
2.43 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Canada vs Chile at a glance

Canada is ahead on 3 of 5 measures, and Chile on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Canada and Chile compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
CanadaChile
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.25 (better)60
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.0% (better)6%
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.65.6 million ha2.43 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.17%14% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.33.1% (better)12.9%

Air quality today

Is Canada cleaner than Chile?

On air quality, yes, right now. Canada has cleaner air than Chile right now: its cities average AQI 25 against 60.

0% of the measured cities in Canada are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 6% in Chile.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Canada

  • Good55 (93%)
  • Moderate4 (7%)

Chile

  • Good12 (39%)
  • Moderate17 (55%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups2 (6%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Canada and Chile compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Canada average cleaner air than 94% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Chile than 38%.

Cleaner air than…

Canada
Beats 94%
Chile
Beats 38%

More tree cover than…

Canada
Beats 74%
Chile
Beats 25%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Canada or Chile?

Canada has lost more: about 65.6 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.43 million ha in Chile, or 27 times as much. 899,000 ha of Canada's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Canada
20012025

Worst year: 2023, with 8.38 million ha lost.

Chile
20012025

Worst year: 2017, with 214,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Canada and Chile, 2001 to 2025
CanadaChile
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.65.6 million ha2.43 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.17%14% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.899,000 ha96,100 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Speeding upSlowing down
Main known causeWildfires (60%)Logging (82%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Canada or Chile?

Canada does: its measured cities average 33.1% tree cover against 12.9%, a gap of 20.2 percentage points.

Canada33.1%
Chile12.9%
Tree figures for Canada and Chile
CanadaChile
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.5.8M (better)1.2M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.41% (better)94%
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.447K (better)1.6M

Behind the averages

The cities behind Canada and Chile

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Canada

Greenest measured city
Saint-Louis-de-Terrebonne68.1% tree cover
Worst air right now
ReginaAQI 76

Chile

Greenest measured city
Coronel36.2% tree cover
Worst air right now
SantiagoAQI 149

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 59 in Canada and 31 in Chile, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Canada rests on 59 cities against 31, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Canada vs Chile: your questions answered

Is Canada cleaner than Chile?

On air quality, yes, right now: Canada's cities average AQI 25 against 60 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather.

Which country has lost more forest, Canada or Chile?

Canada has lost more: about 65.6 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.43 million ha in Chile, or 27 times as much. 899,000 ha of Canada's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Canada or Chile?

Canada does: its measured cities average 33.1% tree cover against 12.9%, a gap of 20.2 percentage points.

How many cities are the Canada and Chile figures based on?

59 measured cities in Canada and 31 in Chile. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Does this cover the whole of Canada and Chile?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Canada

More comparisons for Chile

Build your own

Compare Canada with somewhere else

This place

Canada