Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 169 cities measured

Pakistan vs Ukraine Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Ukraine has cleaner air than Pakistan right now: its cities average AQI 60 against 320.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Pakistan 289 (55 cities) and Ukraine 108 (3 cities). Ukraine has lost more forest since 2001. Ukraine has more tree cover in its cities.

Pakistan

Average of 127 cities

AQI 320

Hazardous

At ground stations
AQI 289
Tree cover
12.5%
Forest lost since 2001
10,300 ha
Ukraine

Average of 42 cities

AQI 60

Moderate

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 108
Tree cover
40.0%
Forest lost since 2001
1.4 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Pakistan vs Ukraine at a glance

Ukraine is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Pakistan on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Pakistan and Ukraine compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
PakistanUkraine
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.32060 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.289108 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.84%10% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.10,300 ha (better)1.4 million ha
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.1% (better)13%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.12.5%40.0% (better)

Air quality today

Is Ukraine cleaner than Pakistan?

On air quality, yes, right now. Ukraine has cleaner air than Pakistan right now: its cities average AQI 60 against 320.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Pakistan 289 (55 cities) and Ukraine 108 (3 cities).

84% of the measured cities in Pakistan are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 10% in Ukraine.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Pakistan

  • Good1 (1%)
  • Moderate19 (15%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups20 (16%)
  • Unhealthy19 (15%)
  • Very unhealthy20 (16%)
  • Hazardous48 (38%)

Ukraine

  • Good19 (45%)
  • Moderate19 (45%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups2 (5%)
  • Unhealthy2 (5%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Pakistan and Ukraine compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Pakistan average cleaner air than 0% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Ukraine than 39%.

Cleaner air than…

Pakistan
Beats 0%
Ukraine
Beats 39%

More tree cover than…

Pakistan
Beats 22%
Ukraine
Beats 89%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Pakistan or Ukraine?

Ukraine has lost more: about 1.4 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 10,300 ha in Pakistan, or 136 times as much. 19,500 ha of Ukraine's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Pakistan
20012025

Worst year: 2006, with 1,340 ha lost.

Ukraine
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 105,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Pakistan and Ukraine, 2001 to 2025
PakistanUkraine
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.10,300 ha (better)1.4 million ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.1% (better)13%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.784 ha (better)19,500 ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Speeding upHolding steady
Main known causeLogging (69%)Logging (85%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Pakistan or Ukraine?

Ukraine does: its measured cities average 40.0% tree cover against 12.5%, a gap of 27.5 percentage points.

Pakistan12.5%
Ukraine40.0%
Tree figures for Pakistan and Ukraine
PakistanUkraine
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.5.0M5.0M (better)
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.95%21% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.11.3M76.2K (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Pakistan and Ukraine

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Pakistan

Greenest measured city
Dhirkot78.0% tree cover
Worst air right now
KasurAQI 874

Ukraine

Greenest measured city
Makiyivka62.0% tree cover
Worst air right now
Ivano-FrankivskAQI 141

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 127 in Pakistan and 42 in Ukraine, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Pakistan rests on 127 cities against 42, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Pakistan vs Ukraine: your questions answered

Is Ukraine cleaner than Pakistan?

On air quality, yes, right now: Ukraine's cities average AQI 60 against 320 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Pakistan 289 (55 cities) and Ukraine 108 (3 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, Pakistan or Ukraine?

Ukraine has lost more: about 1.4 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 10,300 ha in Pakistan, or 136 times as much. 19,500 ha of Ukraine's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Pakistan or Ukraine?

Ukraine does: its measured cities average 40.0% tree cover against 12.5%, a gap of 27.5 percentage points.

How many cities are the Pakistan and Ukraine figures based on?

127 measured cities in Pakistan and 42 in Ukraine. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Pakistan and Ukraine?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Pakistan

More comparisons for Ukraine

Build your own

Compare Pakistan with somewhere else

This place

Pakistan