Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 98 cities measured

Malaysia vs Ukraine Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Ukraine has cleaner air than Malaysia right now: its cities average AQI 59 against 65.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Malaysia 68 (51 cities) and Ukraine 108 (3 cities), which puts Malaysia ahead instead. Malaysia has lost more forest since 2001. Ukraine has more tree cover in its cities.

Malaysia

Average of 56 cities

AQI 65

Moderate

At ground stations
AQI 68
Tree cover
38.7%
Forest lost since 2001
9.77 million ha
Ukraine

Average of 42 cities

AQI 59

Moderate

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 108
Tree cover
40.0%
Forest lost since 2001
1.4 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Malaysia vs Ukraine at a glance

Ukraine is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Malaysia on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Malaysia and Ukraine compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
MalaysiaUkraine
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.6559 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.68 (better)108
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.5% (better)7%
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.9.77 million ha1.4 million ha (better)
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.33%13% (better)
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.38.7%40.0% (better)

Air quality today

Is Ukraine cleaner than Malaysia?

On air quality, yes, right now. Ukraine has cleaner air than Malaysia right now: its cities average AQI 59 against 65.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Malaysia 68 (51 cities) and Ukraine 108 (3 cities), which puts Malaysia ahead instead.

5% of the measured cities in Malaysia are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 7% in Ukraine.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

Malaysia

  • Good15 (27%)
  • Moderate38 (68%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups3 (5%)

Ukraine

  • Good19 (45%)
  • Moderate20 (48%)
  • Unhealthy3 (7%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do Malaysia and Ukraine compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of Malaysia average cleaner air than 30% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Ukraine than 40%.

Cleaner air than…

Malaysia
Beats 30%
Ukraine
Beats 40%

More tree cover than…

Malaysia
Beats 85%
Ukraine
Beats 89%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, Malaysia or Ukraine?

Malaysia has lost more: about 9.77 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.4 million ha in Ukraine, or 7 times as much. 7.55 million ha of Malaysia's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

Malaysia
20012025

Worst year: 2014, with 643,000 ha lost.

Ukraine
20012025

Worst year: 2016, with 105,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in Malaysia and Ukraine, 2001 to 2025
MalaysiaUkraine
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.9.77 million ha1.4 million ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.33%13% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.7.55 million ha19,500 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Slowing downHolding steady
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (74%)Logging (85%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, Malaysia or Ukraine?

Ukraine does: its measured cities average 40.0% tree cover against 38.7%, a gap of 1.2 percentage points.

Malaysia38.7%
Ukraine40.0%
Tree figures for Malaysia and Ukraine
MalaysiaUkraine
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.6.3M (better)5.0M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.45%19% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.518K86.7K (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind Malaysia and Ukraine

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

Malaysia

Greenest measured city
Ijok81.0% tree cover
Worst air right now
Selayang Baru UtaraAQI 137

Ukraine

Greenest measured city
Makiyivka62.0% tree cover
Worst air right now
Ivano-FrankivskAQI 174

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 56 in Malaysia and 42 in Ukraine, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. Malaysia rests on 56 cities against 42, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

Malaysia vs Ukraine: your questions answered

Is Ukraine cleaner than Malaysia?

On air quality, yes, right now: Ukraine's cities average AQI 59 against 65 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are Malaysia 68 (51 cities) and Ukraine 108 (3 cities), which puts Malaysia ahead instead.

Which country has lost more forest, Malaysia or Ukraine?

Malaysia has lost more: about 9.77 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 1.4 million ha in Ukraine, or 7 times as much. 7.55 million ha of Malaysia's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, Malaysia or Ukraine?

Ukraine does: its measured cities average 40.0% tree cover against 38.7%, a gap of 1.2 percentage points.

How many cities are the Malaysia and Ukraine figures based on?

56 measured cities in Malaysia and 42 in Ukraine. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of Malaysia and Ukraine?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for Malaysia

More comparisons for Ukraine

Build your own

Compare Malaysia with somewhere else

This place

Malaysia