Skip to content
Airleaf

Country comparison · 527 cities measured

India vs Malaysia Air quality index (AQI) and deforestation

Malaysia has cleaner air than India right now: its cities average AQI 65 against 152.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are India 165 (219 cities) and Malaysia 68 (51 cities). Malaysia has lost more forest since 2001. Malaysia has more tree cover in its cities.

India

Average of 471 cities

AQI 152

Unhealthy

At ground stations
AQI 165
Tree cover
27.3%
Forest lost since 2001
2.6 million ha
Malaysia

Average of 56 cities

AQI 65

Moderate

Cleaner on average

At ground stations
AQI 68
Tree cover
38.7%
Forest lost since 2001
9.77 million ha

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

India vs Malaysia at a glance

Malaysia is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and India on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

India and Malaysia compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
IndiaMalaysia
Average air qualityUS AQI, all measured cities.15265 (better)
At ground stationsCities with a current station reading.16568 (better)
Cities over AQI 100Not fine for sensitive groups.75%5% (better)
Forest lost since 2001The whole country.2.6 million ha (better)9.77 million ha
Share of its forest lostOf what it had in 2000.6.7% (better)33%
Average tree coverAcross its measured cities.27.3%38.7% (better)

Air quality today

Is Malaysia cleaner than India?

On air quality, yes, right now. Malaysia has cleaner air than India right now: its cities average AQI 65 against 152.

At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are India 165 (219 cities) and Malaysia 68 (51 cities).

75% of the measured cities in India are over AQI 100 today, the point where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups, against 5% in Malaysia.

How each country's cities split across the air quality bands

India

  • Good4 (1%)
  • Moderate113 (24%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups116 (25%)
  • Unhealthy181 (38%)
  • Very unhealthy34 (7%)
  • Hazardous23 (5%)

Malaysia

  • Good15 (27%)
  • Moderate38 (68%)
  • Unhealthy for sensitive groups3 (5%)

Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.

Against everywhere else

How do India and Malaysia compare with other countries?

Right now the cities of India average cleaner air than 2% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and those of Malaysia than 30%.

Cleaner air than…

India
Beats 2%
Malaysia
Beats 30%

More tree cover than…

India
Beats 59%
Malaysia
Beats 85%

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which country has lost more forest, India or Malaysia?

Malaysia has lost more: about 9.77 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.6 million ha in India, or 3.8 times as much. 7.55 million ha of Malaysia's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

The whole country, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: unlike the city averages above, this counts every forest, not just the land around cities.

India
20012025

Worst year: 2017, with 190,000 ha lost.

Malaysia
20012025

Worst year: 2014, with 643,000 ha lost.

Forest loss in India and Malaysia, 2001 to 2025
IndiaMalaysia
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.2.6 million ha (better)9.77 million ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.6.7% (better)33%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.730,000 ha (better)7.55 million ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Holding steadySlowing down
Main known causeShifting farming (59%)Farms, pasture and plantations (74%)

Trees

Which country has more tree cover, India or Malaysia?

Malaysia does: its measured cities average 38.7% tree cover against 27.3%, a gap of 11.5 percentage points.

India27.3%
Malaysia38.7%
Tree figures for India and Malaysia
IndiaMalaysia
Trees standingSummed across measured cities.39.1M (better)6.3M
Cities below their targetShort of the canopy target.77%45% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach those targets.19.0M518K (better)

Behind the averages

The cities behind India and Malaysia

An average says nothing about how far apart the best and worst places are. These are the measured cities at each end.

India

Greenest measured city
Dārjiling88.2% tree cover
Worst air right now
GhāziābādAQI 617

Malaysia

Greenest measured city
Ijok81.0% tree cover
Worst air right now
Selayang Baru UtaraAQI 137

Reading these numbers

What a country average is, and is not

It is a mean of cities

Not a national statistic. Each figure is the average across the cities Airleaf has measured: 471 in India and 56 in Malaysia, each read over the same 2 km radius, on the US EPA index. Rural land and unmeasured towns are not in it.

Coverage shapes the number

A country measured mostly in its capital reads differently from one measured across dozens of towns. India rests on 471 cities against 56, so its average is the steadier of the two. Forest figures come from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

Frequently asked

India vs Malaysia: your questions answered

Is Malaysia cleaner than India?

On air quality, yes, right now: Malaysia's cities average AQI 65 against 152 on the US EPA index. These are live readings averaged across cities, so the gap moves with the weather. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the averages are India 165 (219 cities) and Malaysia 68 (51 cities).

Which country has lost more forest, India or Malaysia?

Malaysia has lost more: about 9.77 million ha of forest from 2001 to 2025, against 2.6 million ha in India, or 3.8 times as much. 7.55 million ha of Malaysia's was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns; the rest burned, was logged or can grow back.

Which country has more tree cover, India or Malaysia?

Malaysia does: its measured cities average 38.7% tree cover against 27.3%, a gap of 11.5 percentage points.

How many cities are the India and Malaysia figures based on?

471 measured cities in India and 56 in Malaysia. Every one was read the same way, so the two averages are directly comparable, but a country with more measured cities has the more settled figure.

Why are there two air quality averages for each country?

The first covers every measured city, using a ground station where one is close and a model estimate everywhere else. The second counts only cities with a current station reading, which is measured rather than estimated but covers fewer places. Airleaf's world rankings use the station figures only.

Does this cover the whole of India and Malaysia?

The air and tree figures are not: they are the cities Airleaf has measured, each over the same 2 km radius, so treat them as a comparison of urban air and urban tree cover. The forest figures are: they count every forest in the country.

More comparisons for India

More comparisons for Malaysia

Build your own

Compare India with somewhere else

This place

India