City report · West Java, Indonesia
Kresek Air quality today
Air quality in Kresek currently reads AQI 158 (Unhealthy): Everyone should limit long outdoor exertion; sensitive groups more so.
AQI 158
Air quality right now
Unhealthy
- PM2.5, fine particles (µg/m³)
- 65.3
- tree cover
- 10.8%
- trees in this area
- 33.9K
- more trees needed
- 91.7K
Measured across a 2 km radius around Kresek, Kecamatan Binuang, Jawa, Indonesia (12.57 km²), from a satellite image of Sep 10, 2026. Lower AQI is better: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous.
Kresek · AQI 158 (Unhealthy)
Kresek's tree count comes to 33,929 trees across 12.57 km², 29 points below the 40% tree-cover level considered healthy for this area, so roughly 91,735 more trees would close the gap.
Air quality detail
Air quality in Kresek today: AQI 158, Unhealthy
Main pollutant: PM2.5 · Observed Nov 11, 02:00 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 3 ground-station cities within 65 km, US EPA index. Values in µg/m³.
Estimate · model corrected with 3 station cities within 65 km, e.g. Tangerang and Teluknaga
Health signal
Everyone should limit long outdoor exertion; sensitive groups more so.
PM2.5
65.3
PM10
98.3
NO₂
48.9
O₃
36.0
SO₂
33.8
CO
682.0
- Outdoor exercise
- Everyone should cut down long or hard exercise; sensitive groups should avoid it
- Windows
- Keep them closed
- Mask
- Wear an N95 outdoors
- Air purifier
- Run one
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Kresek's daily AQI at 140 on average, from 126 on Nov 7 to an hourly peak of 181 on Nov 6.
This is the US EPA AQI. How it differs from Indonesia's ISPU
Where Kresek stands: the most polluted cities in the world right now · the cleanest
Tree cover detail
Tree cover in Kresek: Critically low
10.8% tree cover against a 40% healthy-neighborhood target, across 12.57 km².
Trees in this area
33,929
Target trees
125,664
More trees needed
91,735
CO₂ if planted / yr
2,018 t
Deforestation · 2001–2025
How much forest has Kresek lost?
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Kresek has lost about 18 hectares of forest (about 25 football pitches): 3% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (65%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations.
2017: satellite photo from September 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.
- Forest lost since 2001
- 18 haabout 25 football pitches
- Share of its forest
- 3%of what there was in 2000
- Cleared for good
- 11 hadeforestation: turned into farms, mines or towns
The worst year was 2024, when about 4 hectares of forest were lost.
Hectares of forest lost each year
Show the figures as a table
| Year | Cleared for good | Can grow back | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | under 1 ha | 1 ha | 1 ha |
| 2002 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2003 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2004 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2005 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2006 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2007 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2008 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2009 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2010 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2011 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2012 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2013 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2014 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2015 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2016 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2017 | 2 ha | under 1 ha | 3 ha |
| 2018 | 1 ha | under 1 ha | 1 ha |
| 2019 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2020 | 1 ha | under 1 ha | 1 ha |
| 2021 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2022 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2023 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | 1 ha |
| 2024 | 4 ha | under 1 ha | 4 ha |
| 2025 | 1 ha | 1 ha | 2 ha |
What is causing deforestation around Kresek?
- Farms, pasture and plantationscleared for good62% · 11 ha
- Towns and roadscleared for good2.3% · under 1 ha
- Unknown causescause unknown35% · 6 ha
Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020
- Forest in 2000
- 3,270 ha
- Forest in 2020
- 3,450 ha
- Overall change
- +172 hamore forest than in 2000
Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Kresek grew from about 3,270 hectares to 3,450 hectares, a net gain of about 172 hectares (+5.3%). New forest grew on about 233 hectares, while 60 hectares were lost.
These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.
These figures cover everything within 10 km of the city center, a wider area than the report above, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.
Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. Forest gained and lost 2000–2020: Potapov et al. 2022, UMD GLAD Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, CC BY 4.0. Images: contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data. How it's measured
In the same region
Measured cities near Kresek
Same 2 km radius, same index — so they compare directly.
- Pasarkemis17.2 km
Indonesia
- Tree cover
- 29%
- Air quality
- 69
- Curug24.6 km
Indonesia
- Tree cover
- 24%
- Air quality
- 94
- Serang25.0 km
Indonesia
- Tree cover
- 22%
- Air quality
- 96
- Tangerang28.2 km
Indonesia
- Tree cover
- 10%
- Air quality
- 108
- Teluknaga28.8 km
Indonesia
- Tree cover
- 25%
- Air quality
- 108
- Rangkasbitung29.1 km
Indonesia
- Tree cover
- 46%
- Air quality
- 96
Build your own
Compare Kresek with anywhere
This place
Kresek
Use this data
Put Kresek's numbers on your site
Free to embed. Updates itself as the measurement refreshes.
Frequently asked
Questions about Kresek
What is the air quality (AQI) in Kresek right now?
The latest reading for Kresek shows an AQI of 158 (Unhealthy), observed Nov 11, 02:00 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 3 ground-station cities within 65 km, US EPA index. The main pollutant is PM2.5. Everyone should limit long outdoor exertion; sensitive groups more so.
Is it safe to exercise outside in Kresek today?
At AQI 158 (Unhealthy): everyone should cut down long or hard exercise; sensitive groups should avoid it. Windows: keep them closed. Masks: wear an N95 outdoors. The reading changes through the day, so check again before a long run or ride.
What has the air quality in Kresek been like this week?
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Kresek's daily AQI at 140 on average, from 126 on Nov 7 to an hourly peak of 181 on Nov 6. On 7 of those days the average was above 100, unhealthy for sensitive groups.
Is Kresek's AQI the same as Indonesia's ISPU?
No. Airleaf shows the US EPA Air Quality Index (AQI), the scale used by IQAir and most air-quality apps. Indonesia's official index is the ISPU (Indeks Standar Pencemar Udara), published by the environment ministry from its own monitoring stations. Its bands are 0–50 Baik (good), 51–100 Sedang (moderate), 101–200 Tidak Sehat (unhealthy), 201–300 Sangat Tidak Sehat (very unhealthy) and over 300 Berbahaya (hazardous). The two indexes use different breakpoints and averaging times, so the same air can score differently on each.
How much forest has the area around Kresek lost since 2001?
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Kresek has lost about 18 hectares of forest (about 25 football pitches): 3% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (65%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations. Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Kresek grew from about 3,270 hectares to 3,450 hectares, a net gain of about 172 hectares (+5.3%). New forest grew on about 233 hectares, while 60 hectares were lost.
What is the tree count in Kresek?
Kresek has an estimated 33,929 trees across the 12.57 km² measured — 10.8% tree cover, 29 percentage points short of the 40% tree-cover target set for this area.
How many more trees does Kresek need?
Kresek needs roughly 91,735 more trees to close a 29-point shortfall against its 40% tree-cover target — about 2,018 t of extra CO₂ absorbed per year once grown.
How are Kresek's air quality and tree cover measured?
Air quality comes from ground monitoring stations via OpenAQ where one reports nearby, and otherwise, as here, from the Open-Meteo / CAMS model, which may differ from street-level monitors. Tree cover is measured from Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search satellite imagery at 10 m detail across a 2 km radius around Kresek; the tree count is an estimate derived from that cover.
See your own area
What does your neighborhood look like?
Pick any point and radius to get the same air-quality and tree-cover breakdown.
Check my address