City report · Uttarakhand, India
Kashipur Air quality today
Air quality in Kashipur currently reads AQI 152 (Unhealthy): Everyone should limit long outdoor exertion; sensitive groups more so.
AQI 152
Air quality right now
Unhealthy
- PM2.5, fine particles (µg/m³)
- 57.0
- tree cover
- 22.6%
- trees in this area
- 70.9K
- more trees needed
- 54.6K
Measured across a 2 km radius around Kashipur, Uttarakhand 244713, India (12.57 km²), from a satellite image of Nov 1, 2026. Lower AQI is better: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous.
Kashipur · AQI 152 (Unhealthy)
Kashipur's tree count comes to 70,929 trees across 12.56 km² of land, 17 points below the 40% tree-cover level considered healthy for this area, so roughly 54,609 more trees would close the gap.
Air quality detail
Air quality in Kashipur today: AQI 152, Unhealthy
Main pollutant: PM2.5 · Observed Nov 11, 20:15 local time via OpenAQ ground stations, US EPA index. Values in µg/m³.
Ground station · Govt. Girls Inter College, Kashipur - UKPCB, 500 m away
Health signal
Everyone should limit long outdoor exertion; sensitive groups more so.
PM2.5
57.0
PM10
91.4
NO₂
55.2
O₃
2.6
SO₂
—
CO
—
Data: OpenAQ · CPCB, Central Pollution Control Board, Government of India (GODL-India)
- Outdoor exercise
- Everyone should cut down long or hard exercise; sensitive groups should avoid it
- Windows
- Keep them closed
- Mask
- Wear an N95 outdoors
- Air purifier
- Run one
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Kashipur's daily AQI at 146 on average, from 110 on Nov 10 to an hourly peak of 193 on Nov 5.
This is the US EPA AQI. How it differs from India's AQI (CPCB) · The full guide
Where Kashipur stands: the most polluted cities in the world right now · the cleanest
Tree cover detail
Tree cover in Kashipur: Critically low
22.6% tree cover against a 40% healthy-neighborhood target, across 12.56 km² of land.
Trees in this area
70,929
Target trees
125,538
More trees needed
54,609
CO₂ if planted / yr
1,201 t
Deforestation · 2001–2025
How much forest has Kashipur lost?
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Kashipur has lost about 77 hectares of forest (about 110 football pitches): 5.1% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (52%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations.
2017: satellite photo from May 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km northwest of the city center.
- Forest lost since 2001
- 77 haabout 110 football pitches
- Share of its forest
- 5.1%of what there was in 2000
- Cleared for good
- 40 hadeforestation: turned into farms, mines or towns
The worst year was 2025, when about 34 hectares of forest were lost.
Hectares of forest lost each year
Show the figures as a table
| Year | Cleared for good | Can grow back | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 1 ha | under 1 ha | 2 ha |
| 2002 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | 2 ha |
| 2003 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2004 | 3 ha | under 1 ha | 3 ha |
| 2005 | 2 ha | under 1 ha | 3 ha |
| 2006 | 1 ha | under 1 ha | 1 ha |
| 2007 | 4 ha | under 1 ha | 4 ha |
| 2008 | 1 ha | under 1 ha | 2 ha |
| 2009 | 3 ha | 1 ha | 4 ha |
| 2010 | 3 ha | under 1 ha | 3 ha |
| 2011 | 2 ha | under 1 ha | 2 ha |
| 2012 | 4 ha | under 1 ha | 5 ha |
| 2013 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2014 | 1 ha | under 1 ha | 1 ha |
| 2015 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2016 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2017 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2018 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2019 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2020 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2021 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2022 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2023 | 5 ha | under 1 ha | 5 ha |
| 2024 | 4 ha | under 1 ha | 5 ha |
| 2025 | 4 ha | 30 ha | 34 ha |
What is causing deforestation around Kashipur?
- Farms, pasture and plantationscleared for good33% · 25 ha
- Towns and roadscleared for good19% · 14 ha
- Unknown causescause unknown48% · 37 ha
Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020
- Forest in 2000
- 2,040 ha
- Forest in 2020
- 2,010 ha
- Overall change
- −30 haless forest than in 2000
Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Kashipur stayed about the same size, at about 2,010 hectares: new forest grew on about 124 hectares, and about 155 hectares were lost.
These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.
These figures cover everything within 10 km of the city center, a wider area than the report above, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.
Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. Forest gained and lost 2000–2020: Potapov et al. 2022, UMD GLAD Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, CC BY 4.0. Images: contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data. How it's measured
In the same region
Measured cities near Kashipur
Same 2 km radius, same index — so they compare directly.
Build your own
Compare Kashipur with anywhere
This place
Kashipur
Use this data
Put Kashipur's numbers on your site
Free to embed. Updates itself as the measurement refreshes.
Frequently asked
Questions about Kashipur
What is the air quality (AQI) in Kashipur right now?
The latest reading for Kashipur shows an AQI of 152 (Unhealthy), measured Nov 11, 20:15 local time by the Govt. Girls Inter College, Kashipur - UKPCB ground monitoring station, 500 m away, via OpenAQ. The main pollutant is PM2.5. Everyone should limit long outdoor exertion; sensitive groups more so.
Is it safe to exercise outside in Kashipur today?
At AQI 152 (Unhealthy): everyone should cut down long or hard exercise; sensitive groups should avoid it. Windows: keep them closed. Masks: wear an N95 outdoors. The reading changes through the day, so check again before a long run or ride.
What has the air quality in Kashipur been like this week?
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Kashipur's daily AQI at 146 on average, from 110 on Nov 10 to an hourly peak of 193 on Nov 5. On 7 of those days the average was above 100, unhealthy for sensitive groups.
Is Kashipur's AQI the same as India's AQI (CPCB)?
No. Airleaf shows the US EPA Air Quality Index (AQI), the scale used by IQAir and most air-quality apps. India's Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) publishes the National Air Quality Index on its own scale: 0–50 good, 51–100 satisfactory, 101–200 moderate, 201–300 poor, 301–400 very poor and 401–500 severe. The two scales don't line up. At moderate fine-particle levels the US scale reads higher: 55 µg/m³ of PM2.5 is 149 on the US AQI but about 92, "satisfactory", on India's. In heavy smog India's reads higher: 100 µg/m³ is 182 on the US AQI and about 232, "poor", on India's. CPCB also averages particles over 24 hours, so its figure moves more slowly than an hourly reading.
How much forest has the area around Kashipur lost since 2001?
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Kashipur has lost about 77 hectares of forest (about 110 football pitches): 5.1% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (52%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations. Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Kashipur stayed about the same size, at about 2,010 hectares: new forest grew on about 124 hectares, and about 155 hectares were lost.
What is the tree count in Kashipur?
Kashipur has an estimated 70,929 trees across the 12.56 km² of land measured — 22.6% tree cover, 17 percentage points short of the 40% tree-cover target set for this area.
How many more trees does Kashipur need?
Kashipur needs roughly 54,609 more trees to close a 17-point shortfall against its 40% tree-cover target — about 1,201 t of extra CO₂ absorbed per year once grown.
How are Kashipur's air quality and tree cover measured?
Air quality is measured by ground monitoring stations near Kashipur, via OpenAQ; the 7-day trend is the Open-Meteo / CAMS model's estimate. Tree cover is measured from Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search satellite imagery at 10 m detail across a 2 km radius around Kashipur; the tree count is an estimate derived from that cover.
See your own area
What does your neighborhood look like?
Pick any point and radius to get the same air-quality and tree-cover breakdown.
Check my address