Riga
2 km around Vecrīga
Air quality now
AQI 71
27.8%
tree cover
5.3K more trees would reach 30% tree cover
Europe · air quality report · 5 cities
Right now the 5 cities Airleaf measures in Latvia average AQI 83 (moderate). The worst air is in Jelgava, at AQI 151, and the cleanest in Ventspils, at AQI 53.
At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the average is AQI 88 across 4 cities. 20% of the 5 measured cities are over AQI 100 today, where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups.
Average right now
AQI 83
Moderate
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Latvia · average AQI 83
2 km around Vecrīga
Air quality now
AQI 71
27.8%
tree cover
5.3K more trees would reach 30% tree cover
2 km around Daugavpils
Air quality now
AQI 75
25.1%
tree cover
15.3K more trees would reach 30% tree cover
2 km around Liepāja
Air quality now
AQI 66
23.3%
tree cover
15.5K more trees would reach 30% tree cover
2 km around Jelgava
Air quality now
AQI 151
22.2%
tree cover
55.2K more trees would reach 40% tree cover
2 km around Ventspils
Air quality now
AQI 53
30.7%
tree cover
Healthy tree cover
Across the country
20% of the 5 measured cities are over AQI 100 today, where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.
5 measured cities
Every measured city, including model estimates where no ground station is near.
Against everywhere else
Right now the cities of Latvia average cleaner air than 10% of the 171 countries Airleaf has enough cities to average, and more tree cover than 54%.
Cleaner air than…
More tree cover than…
See the most polluted and cleanest air rankings for every country.
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Since 2001, Latvia has lost about 1.01 million hectares of forest (about 10,000 km²): 29% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it was lost to logging, so much of it can grow back. About 6,980 hectares (under 1%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns.
Hectares of forest lost each year
| Year | Cleared for good | Can grow back | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 203 ha | 24,400 ha | 24,600 ha |
| 2002 | 140 ha | 28,600 ha | 28,800 ha |
| 2003 | 85 ha | 20,900 ha | 21,000 ha |
| 2004 | 227 ha | 30,100 ha | 30,300 ha |
| 2005 | 316 ha | 39,800 ha | 40,100 ha |
| 2006 | 445 ha | 38,000 ha | 38,400 ha |
| 2007 | 323 ha | 35,400 ha | 35,700 ha |
| 2008 | 172 ha | 28,700 ha | 28,900 ha |
| 2009 | 307 ha | 34,200 ha | 34,500 ha |
| 2010 | 456 ha | 47,500 ha | 47,900 ha |
| 2011 | 364 ha | 43,900 ha | 44,300 ha |
| 2012 | 246 ha | 33,700 ha | 33,900 ha |
| 2013 | 114 ha | 27,300 ha | 27,500 ha |
| 2014 | 310 ha | 31,500 ha | 31,800 ha |
| 2015 | 284 ha | 30,200 ha | 30,500 ha |
| 2016 | 371 ha | 44,100 ha | 44,400 ha |
| 2017 | 344 ha | 46,200 ha | 46,500 ha |
| 2018 | 371 ha | 46,000 ha | 46,400 ha |
| 2019 | 345 ha | 56,300 ha | 56,600 ha |
| 2020 | 322 ha | 49,500 ha | 49,800 ha |
| 2021 | 215 ha | 47,600 ha | 47,900 ha |
| 2022 | 262 ha | 56,100 ha | 56,400 ha |
| 2023 | 267 ha | 53,600 ha | 53,900 ha |
| 2024 | 201 ha | 55,700 ha | 55,900 ha |
| 2025 | 290 ha | 54,600 ha | 54,900 ha |
Forest loss has stayed about the same: about 53,800 hectares a year in 2021–2025, against 48,800 hectares a year in 2016–2020. The worst year was 2019, when about 56,600 hectares of forest were lost.
Also: farms, pasture and plantations, towns and roads, wildfires, mining and energy, storms, floods and other natural causes, unknown causes.
Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. How it's measured
55.6% of Latvia was forested as of 2024, against a 30% benchmark. That already clears the benchmark — the city reports above show where cover is still thin locally. Source: World Bank (FAO).
Build your own
This place
Latvia
Clean-air buying guides
Picked by tested clean-air delivery rate (CADR), noise and running cost, from independent test labels. No brand pays to be listed.
Air purifiers that keep up with wildfire smoke and winter smog, ranked by verified smoke CADR, with the room each one clears on a smoky day.
Good HEPA air purifiers under $200 at the makers' own prices, compared on verified clean air, room size and what the filters cost each year.
NIOSH-approved N95 masks and P100 respirators for smog and smoke, and how to get the fit right. Cloth and surgical masks do little against PM2.5.
Frequently asked
Right now the 5 cities Airleaf measures in Latvia average AQI 83 (moderate). The worst air is in Jelgava, at AQI 151, and the cleanest in Ventspils, at AQI 53. At ground stations alone, which measure rather than estimate, the average is AQI 88 across 4 cities. 20% of the 5 measured cities are over AQI 100 today, where the air stops being fine for sensitive groups.
Jelgava, at AQI 151 (Unhealthy) on the US EPA index. Everyone should limit long outdoor exertion; sensitive groups more so.
Ventspils, at AQI 53 (Moderate). Both lists rank current readings, from ground stations wherever Latvia has at least three cities with one.
It depends on the city. 4 cities are Moderate, 1 city is Unhealthy. At the national average of AQI 83: Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.
About 1.01 million ha from 2001 to 2025, 29% of the forest it had in 2000, from the University of Maryland's yearly satellite maps of forest loss. 6,980 ha of it was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.
Each city's reading is the US EPA air quality index, from ground monitoring stations where one has reported recently nearby, and from the CAMS atmospheric model elsewhere; each city's report says which. Tree cover is measured over the same 2 km radius in every city, so the cities compare like for like.
Your own street