United Kingdom · England · 84 cities
Air quality in England today The AQI right now, city by city
Right now, Bradford has the cleanest air of the 84 cities we track in England (AQI 6, Good), and Woking the worst (AQI 110, Unhealthy for sensitive groups). Woking has the most tree cover, at 54.3% — #1 of 92 cities measured in the United Kingdom.
Every city is measured the same way, over the same 1.2 mi (2 km) around its center: the air quality right now, from ground stations where there are any, and its tree cover.
Average right now
AQI 52
Moderate
- cities tracked
- 84
- average tree cover
- 27.0%
- United Kingdom: 26.6%
- worst air now: Woking
- 110
- cleanest air now: Bradford
- 6
Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous, and it reads differently from the UK's Daily Air Quality Index. Measured by Airleaf, refreshed hourly.
England · average AQI 52
Air quality today across England, city by city
| London | 66Moderate | 18.4% | 33.5K | #73 of 92 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manchester | 53Moderate | 13.3% | 52.3K | #86 of 92 |
| Birmingham | 55Moderate | 15.5% | 45.2K | #82 of 92 |
| Sheffield | 40Good | 26.3% | 11.6K | #43 of 92 |
| Leeds | 23Good | 15.7% | 44.8K | #81 of 92 |
| Liverpool | 33Good | 12.9% | 47.9K | #89 of 92 |
| Bristol | 33Good | 26.3% | 11.3K | #42 of 92 |
| Leicester | 26Good | 14.9% | 47.4K | #83 of 92 |
| Bradford | 6Good | 18.2% | 37.0K | #74 of 92 |
| Coventry | 23Good | 27.2% | 8.7K | #39 of 92 |
| Nottingham | 29Good | 27.4% | 8.1K | #37 of 92 |
| Reading | 90Moderate | 28.2% | 5.6K | #34 of 92 |
| Kingston upon Hull | 24Good | 10.4% | 44.0K | #90 of 92 |
| Preston | 57Moderate | 26.9% | 9.5K | #41 of 92 |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | 72Moderate | 24.5% | 16.6K | #52 of 92 |
| Southend-on-Sea | 66Moderate | 16.3% | 29.1K | #79 of 92 |
| Brighton | 100Moderate | 19.5% | 26.2K | #72 of 92 |
| Derby | 33Good | 25.6% | 13.8K | #45 of 92 |
| Southampton | 53Moderate | 16.8% | 29.2K | #78 of 92 |
| Wolverhampton | 55Moderate | 24.7% | 16.6K | #51 of 92 |
| Plymouth | 42Good | 17.6% | 29.0K | #75 of 92 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 19Good | 25.0% | 15.7K | #49 of 92 |
| Milton Keynes | 33Good | 39.6% | — | #9 of 92 |
| Northampton | 38Good | 22.0% | 25.1K | #68 of 92 |
| Oldham | 53Moderate | 23.0% | 22.0K | #65 of 92 |
| Bexley | 99Moderate | 39.5% | — | #10 of 92 |
| Luton | 69Moderate | 24.0% | 18.9K | #56 of 92 |
| Barking | 89Moderate | 16.1% | 43.2K | #80 of 92 |
| Portsmouth | 57Moderate | 10.3% | 47.7K | #92 of 92 |
| Swindon | 22Good | 23.5% | 20.4K | #60 of 92 |
| Dudley | 55Moderate | 35.4% | — | #12 of 92 |
| Sutton | 71Moderate | 44.5% | — | #7 of 92 |
| St Helens | 16Good | 30.7% | — | #27 of 92 |
| Ipswich | 69Moderate | 31.0% | — | #23 of 92 |
| Wigan | 16Good | 31.4% | — | #21 of 92 |
| Warrington | 16Good | 25.2% | 15.1K | #48 of 92 |
| Walsall | 55Moderate | 32.4% | — | #20 of 92 |
| Mansfield | 29Good | 30.1% | — | #29 of 92 |
| Sunderland | 50Good | 17.5% | 34.2K | #76 of 92 |
| Slough | 58Moderate | 21.3% | 27.3K | #70 of 92 |
| Bournemouth | 66Moderate | 50.0% | — | #2 of 92 |
| Peterborough | 30Good | 24.0% | 18.9K | #55 of 92 |
| Oxford | 62Moderate | 39.1% | — | #11 of 92 |
| Enfield Town | 86Moderate | 30.8% | — | #26 of 92 |
| York | 60Moderate | 23.8% | 19.5K | #57 of 92 |
| Telford | 13Good | 45.5% | — | #6 of 92 |
| Burnley | 67Moderate | 34.8% | — | #14 of 92 |
| Harrow | 56Moderate | 28.9% | 3.5K | #33 of 92 |
| Huddersfield | 23Good | 34.3% | — | #15 of 92 |
| Blackburn | 69Moderate | 29.0% | 3.1K | #32 of 92 |
| Cambridge | 44Good | 29.7% | 942 | #30 of 92 |
| Blackpool | 57Moderate | 10.3% | 42.1K | #91 of 92 |
| Basildon | 66Moderate | 30.9% | — | #25 of 92 |
| Norwich | 19Good | 34.9% | — | #13 of 92 |
| Middlesbrough | 51Moderate | 13.1% | 48.6K | #87 of 92 |
| Bolton | 38Good | 28.0% | 6.3K | #35 of 92 |
| Stockport | 22Good | 32.7% | — | #18 of 92 |
| High Wycombe | 90Moderate | 40.9% | — | #8 of 92 |
| Gloucester | 55Moderate | 23.5% | 20.4K | #59 of 92 |
| Exeter | 80Moderate | 24.4% | 17.6K | #54 of 92 |
| Colchester | 85Moderate | 29.3% | 2.2K | #31 of 92 |
| Solihull | 67Moderate | 48.6% | — | #4 of 92 |
| Watford | 58Moderate | 30.2% | — | #28 of 92 |
| Saint Peters | 84Moderate | 21.9% | 25.4K | #69 of 92 |
| Crawley | 93Moderate | 32.9% | — | #17 of 92 |
| Burton upon Trent | 38Good | 24.8% | 16.3K | #50 of 92 |
| Cheltenham | 55Moderate | 27.0% | 9.4K | #40 of 92 |
| Rotherham | 40Good | 31.2% | — | #22 of 92 |
| Worthing | 63Moderate | 13.4% | 42.2K | #85 of 92 |
| Doncaster | 53Moderate | 14.4% | 49.0K | #84 of 92 |
| Chesterfield | 40Good | 27.3% | 8.5K | #38 of 92 |
| Chelmsford | 66Moderate | 24.4% | 17.6K | #53 of 92 |
| Sutton Coldfield | 28Good | 48.3% | — | #5 of 92 |
| Wakefield | 23Good | 25.4% | 14.5K | #46 of 92 |
| Walthamstow | 89Moderate | 22.4% | 22.5K | #67 of 92 |
| Basingstoke | 59Moderate | 32.5% | — | #19 of 92 |
| Maidstone | 97Moderate | 33.0% | — | #16 of 92 |
| Bedford | 28Good | 23.5% | 20.4K | #58 of 92 |
| Woking | 110Unhealthy for sensitive groups | 54.3% | — | #1 of 92 |
| Lincoln | 75Moderate | 25.2% | 15.0K | #47 of 92 |
| Eastbourne | 53Moderate | 23.0% | 15.1K | #63 of 92 |
| Worcester | 38Good | 27.4% | 8.2K | #36 of 92 |
| Bath | 33Good | 48.6% | — | #3 of 92 |
| Gillingham | 58Moderate | 22.7% | 18.9K | #66 of 92 |
Air quality is the US AQI from ground monitoring stations via OpenAQ where available, otherwise the Open-Meteo / CAMS model, refreshed hourly. Tree cover is measured within 1.2 mi (2 km) of each city center from Sentinel-2 imagery; the rank compares every city measured in the United Kingdom.
Is this the same as the UK's Daily Air Quality Index?
No. Airleaf shows the US EPA Air Quality Index (AQI), the scale used by IQAir and most air-quality apps. The UK's Daily Air Quality Index (DAQI), published by Defra, runs from 1 to 10: 1–3 low, 4–6 moderate, 7–9 high and 10 very high. It is a different scale altogether, so a US AQI figure can't be read on it directly; both, though, are built from the same main pollutants, with fine particles (PM2.5) usually the one that decides the reading.
Deforestation · 2001–2025
How much forest has England lost?
Since 2001, England has lost about 120,000 hectares of forest (about 170,000 football pitches): 8% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it was lost to logging, so much of it can grow back. About 6,550 hectares (5.4%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns.
- Forest lost since 2001
- 120,000 haabout 170,000 football pitches
- Share of its forest
- 8%of what there was in 2000
- Cleared for good
- 6,550 hadeforestation: turned into farms, mines or towns
Hectares of forest lost each year
Show the figures as a table
| Year | Cleared for good | Can grow back | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 1,770 ha | 5,800 ha | 7,560 ha |
| 2002 | 516 ha | 4,120 ha | 4,630 ha |
| 2003 | 15 ha | 355 ha | 370 ha |
| 2004 | 482 ha | 7,100 ha | 7,580 ha |
| 2005 | 557 ha | 3,360 ha | 3,910 ha |
| 2006 | 574 ha | 10,200 ha | 10,700 ha |
| 2007 | 164 ha | 4,310 ha | 4,470 ha |
| 2008 | 375 ha | 5,490 ha | 5,870 ha |
| 2009 | 451 ha | 6,490 ha | 6,950 ha |
| 2010 | 416 ha | 6,320 ha | 6,740 ha |
| 2011 | 207 ha | 2,270 ha | 2,480 ha |
| 2012 | 148 ha | 5,450 ha | 5,600 ha |
| 2013 | 106 ha | 4,440 ha | 4,550 ha |
| 2014 | 120 ha | 5,320 ha | 5,440 ha |
| 2015 | 42 ha | 3,640 ha | 3,680 ha |
| 2016 | 69 ha | 4,380 ha | 4,440 ha |
| 2017 | 101 ha | 4,160 ha | 4,260 ha |
| 2018 | 69 ha | 3,290 ha | 3,350 ha |
| 2019 | 61 ha | 4,260 ha | 4,320 ha |
| 2020 | 36 ha | 2,810 ha | 2,850 ha |
| 2021 | 54 ha | 4,230 ha | 4,280 ha |
| 2022 | 57 ha | 5,430 ha | 5,490 ha |
| 2023 | 44 ha | 3,820 ha | 3,860 ha |
| 2024 | 50 ha | 3,510 ha | 3,560 ha |
| 2025 | 69 ha | 3,280 ha | 3,350 ha |
Forest loss has stayed about the same: about 4,110 hectares a year in 2021–2025, against 3,840 hectares a year in 2016–2020. The worst year was 2006, when about 10,700 hectares of forest were lost.
What is causing deforestation in England?
- Loggingcan grow back84% · 101,000 ha
- Wildfirescan grow back5.6% · 6,700 ha
- Farms, pasture and plantationscleared for good4.3% · 5,120 ha
Also: towns and roads, storms, floods and other natural causes, mining and energy, unknown causes.
Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. How it's measured
Other nations in the United Kingdom
Clean-air buying guides
Cleaner air at home in England
Picked by tested clean-air delivery rate (CADR), noise and running cost, from independent test labels. No brand pays to be listed.
- The best air purifiers for wildfire smoke and smog
Air purifiers that keep up with wildfire smoke and winter smog, ranked by verified smoke CADR, with the room each one clears on a smoky day.
- The best air purifiers for bedrooms: quiet picks sized for your room
Quiet HEPA air purifiers for bedrooms, compared on what matters at night: noise on the lowest setting (from 20 dB), verified room size and filter cost.
- The best air purifiers under $200
Good HEPA air purifiers under $200 at the makers' own prices, compared on verified clean air, room size and what the filters cost each year.
Your own street