City report · California, United States
Chico Air quality today
Air quality in Chico currently reads AQI 25 (Good): Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.
Air quality right now
AQI 25
Good
- PM2.5, fine particles (µg/m³)
- 4.5
- tree cover
- 52.5%
- trees in this area
- 165K
- more trees needed
- 0
Measured across a 1.2 mi (2 km) radius around Chico, CA, USA (4.9 sq mi), from a satellite image of Sep 15, 2026. Lower AQI is better: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous.
Chico · AQI 25 (Good)
Chico's tree count comes to 164,934 trees across 4.9 sq mi (12.57 km²), already at or above the 30% tree-cover level considered healthy for this area.
Air quality detail
Air quality in Chico today: AQI 25, Good
Main pollutant: PM2.5 · Observed Nov 11, 06:00 local time via OpenAQ ground stations, US EPA index. Values in µg/m³.
Ground station · Chico - East, 2.3 mi (3.7 km) away
Health signal
Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.
PM2.5
4.5
PM10
—
NO₂
13.4
O₃
11.8
SO₂
—
CO
—
Data: OpenAQ · AirNow
- Outdoor exercise
- A good day to be active outside
- Windows
- Open them to air the house
- Mask
- Not needed
- Air purifier
- Not needed
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Chico's daily AQI at 34 on average, from 16 on Nov 6 to an hourly peak of 63 on Nov 8.
Where Chico stands: the most polluted cities in the world right now · the cleanest
Tree cover detail
Tree cover in Chico: Healthy tree cover
52.5% tree cover against a 30% healthy-neighborhood target, across 4.9 sq mi (12.57 km²).
Trees in this area
164,934
Target trees
164,934
More trees needed
0
CO₂ if planted / yr
0 kg
Deforestation · 2001–2025
How much forest has Chico lost?
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Chico has lost about 3,940 acres (1,600 hectares) of forest (about 3,000 football fields): 35% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (96%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations.

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km south of the city center.
- Forest lost since 2001
- 3,940 acres (1,600 ha)about 3,000 football fields
- Share of its forest
- 35%of what there was in 2000
- Cleared for good
- 3,780 acres (1,530 ha)deforestation: turned into farms, mines or towns
Forest loss is speeding up: about 343 acres (139 hectares) a year in 2021–2025, up from 183 acres (74 hectares) a year in 2016–2020. The worst year was 2023, when about 845 acres (342 hectares) of forest were lost.
Acres of forest lost each year
Show the figures as a table
| Year | Cleared for good | Can grow back | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 86 acres (35 ha) | under 1 ha | 86 acres (35 ha) |
| 2002 | 65 acres (26 ha) | under 1 ha | 67 acres (27 ha) |
| 2003 | 35 acres (14 ha) | under 1 ha | 36 acres (15 ha) |
| 2004 | 40 acres (16 ha) | under 1 ha | 41 acres (17 ha) |
| 2005 | 42 acres (17 ha) | under 1 ha | 42 acres (17 ha) |
| 2006 | 83 acres (34 ha) | 2 acres (1 ha) | 86 acres (35 ha) |
| 2007 | 13 acres (5 ha) | 24 acres (10 ha) | 38 acres (15 ha) |
| 2008 | 190 acres (77 ha) | 56 acres (23 ha) | 246 acres (100 ha) |
| 2009 | 398 acres (161 ha) | under 1 ha | 398 acres (161 ha) |
| 2010 | 48 acres (20 ha) | under 1 ha | 48 acres (20 ha) |
| 2011 | 91 acres (37 ha) | under 1 ha | 92 acres (37 ha) |
| 2012 | 105 acres (42 ha) | under 1 ha | 105 acres (42 ha) |
| 2013 | 8 acres (3 ha) | under 1 ha | 8 acres (3 ha) |
| 2014 | 16 acres (6 ha) | under 1 ha | 16 acres (7 ha) |
| 2015 | 7 acres (3 ha) | under 1 ha | 7 acres (3 ha) |
| 2016 | 241 acres (98 ha) | 11 acres (4 ha) | 252 acres (102 ha) |
| 2017 | 133 acres (54 ha) | under 1 ha | 133 acres (54 ha) |
| 2018 | 67 acres (27 ha) | under 1 ha | 68 acres (27 ha) |
| 2019 | 339 acres (137 ha) | 54 acres (22 ha) | 393 acres (159 ha) |
| 2020 | 68 acres (28 ha) | under 1 ha | 68 acres (28 ha) |
| 2021 | 114 acres (46 ha) | under 1 ha | 114 acres (46 ha) |
| 2022 | 159 acres (64 ha) | under 1 ha | 159 acres (64 ha) |
| 2023 | 845 acres (342 ha) | under 1 ha | 845 acres (342 ha) |
| 2024 | 230 acres (93 ha) | under 1 ha | 231 acres (94 ha) |
| 2025 | 363 acres (147 ha) | 2 acres (1 ha) | 366 acres (148 ha) |
What is causing deforestation around Chico?
- Farms, pasture and plantationscleared for good93% · 3,660 acres (1,480 ha)
- Wildfirescan grow back3.3% · 131 acres (53 ha)
- Towns and roadscleared for good3.1% · 124 acres (50 ha)
Also: storms, floods and other natural causes, unknown causes.
Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020
- Forest in 2000
- 18,600 acres (7,510 ha)
- Forest in 2020
- 19,300 acres (7,800 ha)
- Overall change
- +707 acres (286 ha)more forest than in 2000
Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Chico grew from about 18,600 acres (7,510 hectares) to 19,300 acres (7,800 hectares), a net gain of about 707 acres (286 hectares) (+3.8%). New forest grew on about 2,270 acres (917 hectares), while 1,560 acres (631 hectares) were lost.
These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.
These figures cover everything within 10 km of the city center, a wider area than the report above, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.
Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. Forest gained and lost 2000–2020: Potapov et al. 2022, UMD GLAD Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, CC BY 4.0. Images: contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data. How it's measured
In the same region
Measured cities near Chico
Same 2 km radius, same index — so they compare directly.
- Roseville118.4 km
United States
- Tree cover
- 23%
- Air quality
- 52
- Sacramento130.9 km
United States
- Tree cover
- 26%
- Air quality
- 63
- Elk Grove152.2 km
United States
- Tree cover
- 21%
- Air quality
- 52
- Santa Rosa162.0 km
United States
- Tree cover
- 26%
- Air quality
- 30
- Fairfield165.4 km
United States
- Tree cover
- 11%
- Air quality
- 8
- Reno174.7 km
United States
- Tree cover
- 17%
- Air quality
- 42
Build your own
Compare Chico with anywhere
This place
Chico
Use this data
Put Chico's numbers on your site
Free to embed. Updates itself as the measurement refreshes.
Frequently asked
Questions about Chico
What is the air quality (AQI) in Chico right now?
The latest reading for Chico shows an AQI of 25 (Good), measured Nov 11, 06:00 local time by the Chico - East ground monitoring station, 2.3 mi (3.7 km) away, via OpenAQ. The main pollutant is PM2.5. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.
Is it safe to exercise outside in Chico today?
At AQI 25 (Good): a good day to be active outside. Windows: open them to air the house. Masks: not needed. The reading changes through the day, so check again before a long run or ride.
What has the air quality in Chico been like this week?
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Chico's daily AQI at 34 on average, from 16 on Nov 6 to an hourly peak of 63 on Nov 8. No day averaged above 100, the level where the air turns unhealthy for sensitive groups.
How much forest has the area around Chico lost since 2001?
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Chico has lost about 3,940 acres (1,600 hectares) of forest (about 3,000 football fields): 35% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (96%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations. Forest loss is speeding up: about 343 acres (139 hectares) a year in 2021–2025, up from 183 acres (74 hectares) a year in 2016–2020. Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Chico grew from about 18,600 acres (7,510 hectares) to 19,300 acres (7,800 hectares), a net gain of about 707 acres (286 hectares) (+3.8%). New forest grew on about 2,270 acres (917 hectares), while 1,560 acres (631 hectares) were lost.
What is the tree count in Chico?
Chico has an estimated 164,934 trees across the 4.9 sq mi (12.57 km²) measured — 52.5% tree cover, already past the 30% tree-cover target set for this area.
How many more trees does Chico need?
Chico has already reached its tree-cover target, so no additional trees are needed to close the gap.
How are Chico's air quality and tree cover measured?
Air quality is measured by ground monitoring stations near Chico, via OpenAQ; the 7-day trend is the Open-Meteo / CAMS model's estimate. Tree cover is measured from Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search satellite imagery at 10 m detail across a 1.2 mi (2 km) radius around Chico; the tree count is an estimate derived from that cover.
See your own area
What does your neighborhood look like?
Pick any point and radius to get the same air-quality and tree-cover breakdown.
Check my address
