Deforestation · 2001–2025
Deforestation in Ecuador
Since 2001, Ecuador has lost about 1.12 million hectares of forest (about 11,000 km²): 5.9% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (78%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations.
- Forest in 2000
- 19 million ha
- Forest lost since 2001
- 1.12 million ha5.9% of it, about 11,000 km²
- Cleared for good
- 875,000 hadeforestation, 78% of the loss
- Worst year
- 201274,600 ha lost
Map
Where Ecuador has lost forest
Every square kilometre of Ecuador as satellites saw it from 2000 to 2025. Yellow and green were forest; red to white marks where it has been lost since 2001, and when.
- Forest cover in 2000
- 0%25%50%75%100%How much of the land was forest: dark purple had little or none, yellow was dense forest.
- Year the forest was lost
- 200120132025Where forest was cut down, burned or cleared since 2001: red for the early years, through orange, to white for the most recent. Solid where a fifth or more of a place's forest went, fainter where 8% or more did.
- Cities
- The capital (the larger dot) and the biggest cities, to help you find your way.
Year by year
Forest lost in Ecuador, year by year
Forest loss has stayed about the same: about 48,200 hectares a year in 2021–2025, against 48,100 hectares a year in 2016–2020. The worst year was 2012, when about 74,600 hectares of forest were lost.
Hectares of forest lost each year
Show the figures as a table
| Year | Cleared for good | Can grow back | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 38,800 ha | 6,520 ha | 45,400 ha |
| 2002 | 23,400 ha | 6,690 ha | 30,100 ha |
| 2003 | 10,700 ha | 3,290 ha | 14,000 ha |
| 2004 | 32,400 ha | 5,140 ha | 37,500 ha |
| 2005 | 35,600 ha | 5,180 ha | 40,800 ha |
| 2006 | 30,100 ha | 5,620 ha | 35,700 ha |
| 2007 | 55,000 ha | 5,910 ha | 60,900 ha |
| 2008 | 45,700 ha | 6,240 ha | 52,000 ha |
| 2009 | 51,300 ha | 6,590 ha | 57,900 ha |
| 2010 | 28,600 ha | 5,250 ha | 33,800 ha |
| 2011 | 36,700 ha | 7,010 ha | 43,700 ha |
| 2012 | 63,600 ha | 11,000 ha | 74,600 ha |
| 2013 | 37,900 ha | 10,500 ha | 48,500 ha |
| 2014 | 25,100 ha | 5,980 ha | 31,100 ha |
| 2015 | 22,100 ha | 8,180 ha | 30,300 ha |
| 2016 | 31,300 ha | 13,200 ha | 44,500 ha |
| 2017 | 52,200 ha | 19,400 ha | 71,600 ha |
| 2018 | 26,100 ha | 13,100 ha | 39,200 ha |
| 2019 | 25,900 ha | 10,100 ha | 36,000 ha |
| 2020 | 32,800 ha | 16,400 ha | 49,300 ha |
| 2021 | 20,600 ha | 9,820 ha | 30,500 ha |
| 2022 | 34,700 ha | 18,200 ha | 52,900 ha |
| 2023 | 31,900 ha | 11,400 ha | 43,300 ha |
| 2024 | 43,800 ha | 18,400 ha | 62,300 ha |
| 2025 | 38,300 ha | 13,700 ha | 52,000 ha |
The satellite method improved in 2011, so compare recent years with each other rather than with the 2000s. Hover over or tap a year for its figures.
Causes
What is causing deforestation in Ecuador?
- 78%cleared for good (deforestation)
- 21%can grow back (fire, logging, storms)
- under 1%cause unknown
- Farms, pasture and plantations77% · 858,000 ha
Cleared for good. Forest cleared for crops, cattle pasture or tree plantations: the biggest cause of deforestation in the world.
- Shifting farming15% · 169,000 ha
Can grow back. Small patches cleared to grow crops for a few seasons, then left to grow back.
- Storms, floods and other natural causes2.8% · 31,500 ha
Can grow back. Trees killed by storms, floods, landslides, pests or disease.
- Logging2.3% · 26,300 ha
Can grow back. Trees cut for timber or paper. The land usually stays forest and grows back.
Also, each under 1%: mining and energy, towns and roads, wildfires, unknown causes.
Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
Is all forest loss deforestation?
No. When forest is cleared for farms, mines or towns, it is gone for good: that is deforestation. When it is logged or burned, it usually grows back. We count both as forest lost, but only the first as deforestation, so a country with a bad fire year isn't shown as clearing its forest for good.
Cities that lost the most forest around them
Forest lost within 10 km of each city centre since 2001.
| City | Forest lost | Share of its forest | Cleared for good |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quevedo | 3,060 ha | 14% | 3,050 ha |
| Santo Domingo de los Colorados | 1,690 ha | 7.9% | 1,680 ha |
| Esmeraldas | 1,090 ha | 7.3% | 1,060 ha |
| Milagro | 859 ha | 7.1% | 852 ha |
| Cuenca | 625 ha | 7.9% | 448 ha |
| Loja | 604 ha | 3.2% | 468 ha |
| Daule | 601 ha | 12% | 568 ha |
| Quito | 430 ha | 4% | 278 ha |
| Portoviejo | 249 ha | 2.4% | 233 ha |
| Machala | 239 ha | 3.1% | 226 ha |
Satellite timelapses of cities in Ecuador
A satellite photo a year since 2017, with the forest lost marked on it, and the figures for each city.
Frequently asked
Questions about deforestation in Ecuador
How much forest has Ecuador lost since 2001?
Since 2001, Ecuador has lost about 1.12 million hectares of forest (about 11,000 km²): 5.9% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (78%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations.
Is deforestation in Ecuador getting worse?
Forest loss has stayed about the same: about 48,200 hectares a year in 2021–2025, against 48,100 hectares a year in 2016–2020. These are five-year averages from 2011 on, the years the satellite maps were all made the same way.
What is causing deforestation in Ecuador?
The main causes of forest loss since 2001 are farms, pasture and plantations (77%), shifting farming (15%), storms, floods and other natural causes (2.8%). About 875,000 hectares was deforestation, meaning forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns. Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
What was the worst year for forest loss in Ecuador?
The worst year was 2012, when about 74,600 hectares of forest were lost.
How is forest loss measured?
We use satellite maps from the University of Maryland (Hansen and colleagues) that show, for every 30 × 30 m patch of land on Earth, the year its trees were cut down, burned or died, from 2001 to 2025. We add up those patches in Ecuador, counting only places that were at least 30% covered by trees in 2000. The cause of each loss comes from a map made by the World Resources Institute and Google DeepMind. All figures are estimates.